anthony mychal

The True Meaning of Tricking – How to Use Failure

by

As with any sport, the glamorous gets the attention. No one cares about role players and bench warmers. The starters and stars command the market and the money.

Photo Credit: DJSWIM - DEVIANT ART

But oftentimes these stars are anything but stars until they seize an opportunity to succeed. Few people waltz their way to the top without hardship. It’s filled with mistakes, regrets, and sleepless nights. Usually the people that make it are the ones that can tolerate their own inadequacies long enough to make them adequate. So stick with it. Your time will come, and you will be ready.

I know of no better example than tricking. Everyone releases high class samplers that have no crashes or flaws. But it’s never like that. In fact, most sampler make me depressed. We need hope. We need to know that the best fail sometimes. We need to know they are human, that they were once like we are.

Last week, I blogged about the crazy videos in the tricking world. But, truthfully, that’s not tricking. Those were highlight reels. These videos below are more like tricking, complete with crashes, experimentation, and (at times) unclean tricks.

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M91rF-0bKTM

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VRm0F4Iz8Rw

 It takes a certain mentality to repeatedly fail, which is fairly common in tricking. But that’s kind of the point. It’s not about where you end up, it’s how to you get there. This video below is as basic as it comes, but what I love about it is the friendship. Find those around you that are supportive and never let go, no matter what you’re doing.  Everyone is obsessed about creating a magnificent display of tricks, but it’s videos like these that will spark good memories when you go back and watch then five years from now.

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H1sVpaFg_Bc

The videos above (and below) are barely viewed compared to higher end tricking videos. But don’t let anyone fool you. This is the sport. It’s never a set of complete successions.

Some people train their whole lives because they enjoy the journey. A friend of mine sent me his sampler over the weekend. It took him years to create something that he felt was “decent.”

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=72qHyZri54I

But it’s not always about the product.  There are machines that release videos of themselves and their pristine tricks. But there’s a generation that wants–and needs–to see failure. So show your blemishes at times. Show us you’re human. No one is judging you.

Why Training for Muscle Year Round Might Kill Your Gains

by

Average guys oogle over the beasts of the NFL every Sunday. Hell, I do too. In fact, I admire everything they go through to get where they are (as I showcased in The Football Theory of Life). Their fluidity and grace combined with their speed, power, and strength is marveling. But here’s what’s interesting: guys never gain muscle during the season (and probably most other attributes such as speed, power, and strength).

When we actually see the athletes every Sunday, they are more so on cruise control with their focus on recovering from each game. So most of these athletes get bigger than you’ll ever dream of, and they do it during a 6-7 month off season.

And here you are, training 12 months out of the year, specifically for muscle. You’re even afraid of deloading because you think a week off is suicide for your gains.

I recently finished up an article that’s being submitted to a publisher that deals with the nervous system, and specifically its “flight or fight” response.

The first time you see a black bear in the woods, you soil yourself, your heart rate skies, and you sprint away. But if you saw that bear every day, your pants wouldn’t get dirty like they did the first time you saw it. You would eventually get used to it because your escape route is planned and you start to know the bear more and more, so there is less to be worried about. With every exposure, it becomes less and less alarming.

This is what kind of what happens when you train for the same thing, at the same level, all year round.

You’ve probably heard that people that don’t normally do isolation exercises see great gains when they incorporate them into their routine. It’s a new (and more direct) stimulus that the body needs to adapt to.

There are people afraid to train in a low end rep range for a month with no isolation exercises because they think they’ll shrivel. They won’t. And when they come back, and do a little higher rep work with isolation exercises, they’ll see even better gains.

Be content with having to “just maintain” if your schedule warrants it, because once you return, you’ll probably explode. But for athletes, this comes down to not being afraid to shut it down during the season. Focus on performing and recovering from your sport. You’ll do the damage when it needs done, even if you only have six months to do it.

 

 

This Week in Tricking (Juji, Antoine, Yuri, Ott, Vellu, Giga)

by

This is my first time highlighting what’s going on in the Tricking world. Although samplers will be the main feature, I hope to start posting more information specific to tricksters–similar to what I have already done by interviewing Yuri Marmerstein and Vellu Saarela. Video barrages are fun and all, but I like to think I have more to offer than that.

Leave it up to Juji and Antoine to kick off this week’s highlights with an awesome new sampler: NSIV (Nuclear Summer 4). This is an absolute pleasure. It’s been so long since Juji has released anything. Good to see them both lifting heavy and flying all over the place. It’s crazy to think about where these guys have come from, physically, since their first summer extravaganza (see Scorch).

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cLlwuAJLY_E

Yuri Marmerstein showcases his hand balancing and gymnastic skills in this video. What I love about Yuri’s stuff is that you can look back and see how far he has come. Knowing how difficult planches and static holds are, respect how much time and effort he puts into it. Oh, did I mention he can trick too?

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mIXeN5osuSQ

This video is “old,” but I’d hate myself if I didn’t post it. I guess it’s my fault for starting this tradition so late, but Ott has always been an inspiring trickster. In an age when everyone is indoors tricking on plyo floors and with the comfort of matting, this guy always releases backyard footage, often in bad weather and in shoes.

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t92_Txzh5Ew

Vellu, disgusting as always. I’m not sure I have much else to say here. In my opinion, the “best” there is from a talent and ability standpoint. I just hope nothing slows him and his innovation down.

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cdo5uSdOpMg

Here’s some footage of the most recent Giga Gathering. Aside from the mind blowing tricks, look at the crowd. The first Maryland gathering had about ten tricksters. Now there seem to be hundreds of observers. Crazy how much it has grown.

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pvf47JnYahk

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=4ijux0axEzo

Lastly, I wanted to mention that there’s a special edition of My Mad Methods that features an article written by myself that is about tricking. There was a slight mix-up with my editor in that I was submitting the article for some initial thoughts and he took it as my final piece, so it’s not as well written as it could be. But I’m anxious to see it, as it’s my first real paper publication. You can find more about the issue here.

 

The “Strength” Part of Strength and Conditioning

by

It’s a curse. When I see athletes flying around I can’t help wonder if they squat. Or, perhaps, deadlift. If they overhead press, or just stick to benching. I can be a little obsessive, I know.

When Usain Bolt crossed the finish line I wondered what his training program looked like. But this saddens me because I know better. I know athletes aren’t made in the weight room…or are they?

Now, “athlete” is a loose term. Skill activities without physical demands don’t usually qualify as “sports.” This is debatable, I know.  But no one wants to know how much Norm Duke squats. Same goes for the creepy guy in the back of the bar nailing bull’s-eyes. Does it take skill? Sure. Physical capacity? Hell no.

Most sports will have a spattering of both. A point guard in basketball has to have agility, ball handling skills, and shooting skills. A lineman in football has to have clean footwork and the strength to throw around another 300lb human resisting arrest. A wide receiver  in football needs hand-eye coordination, speed, agility, and strength if the defense is pressing.

Some would say that squatting to improve leg strength is as essential to a point guard as it is to a lineman. But that’s only because the world is obsessed with strength.

The point guard is more like the bowler in that his position relies more on skill. Linemen are on the opposite end of the spectrum. They need skill, but they need more physical capacity than a point guard. A wide receiver is kind of a mix of the two.

But there are variations both within sports and between sports. So how do you know how important strength really is? Well, it’s almost as simple as deciding if the athlete is more like the bowler, or more like the lineman.

 THE CONTINIUM

Consider two main categories of skills: general and specific. General skills improve your performance, but in an indirect way. It’s like a soccer player that squats to improve leg strength so he can kick the ball farther. A stronger leg helps, but you still have to have the technique.

Specific skills improve your performance directly. It’s like a soccer player doing max distance kicks so he can kick the ball farther.

A big vertical jump is a nice general capacity for a point guard to have, but it’s not going to help him shoot the ball in the hoop. And shooting the ball in the hoop is the main job of the point guard.

Which player is more likely to make it into the NBA? The one that can jump high, or the one that can shoot lights out? Well, just ask Jimmer Ferdette.

He's going to make this shot, and that's why he's so damn good.

The usual “strength and conditioning” fails because it only focuses on general capacities. Sadly, everyone pursues them without regard for the skill capacities. You know, the necessary part.

Athletes are enhanced in the weight room, not created. Ask Larry Bird if his vertical jump hurt his career.

Don't tell the scouts my vertical is only ten inches.

What separates me or you from world class athletes isn’t general skill capacities. I bet most reading this are stronger than half the people in the NBA. But the millions are made in the skills specific to the game.

Yet, developing general capacities somehow became more important than developing specific ones. But general capacities only have to be developed to the level at which skill proficiency requires them to be. Go back to the bowler and the lineman. If you want to throw strikes, squats aren’t the answer.

SKILLS

In, Outliers, Malcolm Gladwell says that it takes 10,000 hours to become proficient in a skill. Putting it in perspective, it would take about eight years to hit that number if you practiced for two hours every day.

So when you send me that e-mail that says you can’t make the varsity team because you can’t jump high, is that really the only reason? Or do you just suck at basketball? Maybe your time spent on jump training would be better spent actually shooting the ball in the hoop.

Most things we can influence in the weight room boil down to strength, muscle mass, explosiveness, quickness, and power, giving us these questions:

1)    Do I need more skill or technique?

2)    Do I need to be stronger?

3)    Do I need to be faster?

4)    Do I need to be more powerful?

5)    Do I need more muscular bodyweight?

Answer these questions in order. Here are some examples:

#1: I want to be a dart player.

Answers: 1= YES. 2=NO. 3=NO. 4=NO. 5=NO.

Easy. All skill. Unless you can’t get a dart stuck in the cork. And if you have that problem you’re beyond my expertise.

Sadly, that’s where easy end.

#2: I want to be a point guard in the NBA.

Answers: 1=YES. 2=NO. 3=PROBABLY. 4=PERHAPS. 5=NO.

When you start getting into probably’s, perhaps’s, and maybe’s, you’re entering a world that can’t be explained in one article.

Not only do the answers depend on the position in question, they depend on the specific athlete in question. Everyone has their own style and way of play.

A strong wide receiver, like Anquan Boldin, isn’t going to have a tough time fighting off press coverage, where as a smaller more speedy receiver, like Mike Wallace, may. Same sport. Same position. Different needs.

But if you answer “YES” to number one, that is your priority. You won’t make it anywhere until your specific skills are developed enough for the level at which you want to compete

There are stories of powerlifters being stronger than olympic weightlifters. If that is true, why aren’t more powerlifters in the Olympics? Because they lack the technique and skill. Remember the 10,000 hour rule? It’s not something that can be fixed overnight.

So, as an athlete, ask yourself those five questions. Make sure your skills aren’t your weakest link. They can’t be. You don’t have to be the strongest on the team. You don’t have to be the biggest on the team. But if you can do what your sport entails, skill wise, you’ll sit in a good spot.

Strength Imbalances Put to Rest – Why Great Athletes are Imbalanced

by

Do strength imbalances cause injury? Or are they a natural adaptation grown out of the impulse to survive? There’s no definitive answer, or so it would seem. Theories of injury causes run amok. But they are all the same in that they are theories. Suppositions. What should be or could be. Not what is.

Truthfully, I’m using nothing but should-be’s and could-be’s to try to disprove others. But that’s really what the fitness industry is all about. Few things are absolute. So I hope that my theory gives you a new perspective. One that you never had, or thought of having. One that can help you better understand how to protect yourself in the future.

A QUICK REVIEW

This is the fourth time I’ve written about strength imbalances. It might help if you went back and refreshed your mind.

In the first article, I talked about the shortcomings of the research field. How most machines don’t mimic real life movement and how most recommended ratios are guesses.

In the second article, I talked about how imbalances are nothing more than adaptations, just like strength or size. A baseball player will always be a stronger rotator to his dominant side because he has to be.

In the third article, I talked about defining a human baseline, which makes classifying imbalances even more difficult. It contains quotes from Bret Contreras and Eric Cressey that agree with my ramblings.

IRRITANTS, VIRUSES, AND ADAPTATION

As I mentioned in the second article, imbalances are adaptations. The body doesn’t intend on having one side stronger than the other. It happens because it’s just reacting to what it’s exposed to.

Training is an irritant to the body, kind of like a virus. If you do squats, the body responds by making the legs stronger so it doesn’t get crushed by the weight on your back. If you get chickenpox, the body responds by making antibodies so that it doesn’t get threatened by the disease again.

But if the body responds to training as an irritant, wouldn’t it naturally build itself up into a mega-creation impervious to injury? Theoretically, yes. But the body cares about survival and not performance. That’s why thoughts of cannibalism creep into your mind if you get stranded in the arctic with a few friends.

It's all about survival. Even from birth.

In addition to the body’s focus on survival, it won’t transform into Megatron unless it’s given the time to recover from the stressful events. Chickenpox isn’t cured in an hour. So let’s take a look at the potential causes of injury.

CAUSES OF INJURIES

Before I give you my three reasons of why injuries occur, remember that these are nothing more than my theories. My should-be’s and could-be’s.

The first reason injuries occur is by simply doing something wrong. Call it bad form, but putting yourself in compromising positions or using bad mechanics will expose structures to stress they aren’t designed to handle. This can be squatting with the knees inward or bench pressing with the shoulders flared. The body can’t move in all directions. Respect how each joint in the body works.

The second reason injuries occur is by not being able to recover from irritants. Recovery being the key word here. The more you stress yourself, the longer it takes to recover. It’s like getting a cold, and then a day later getting the flu, and then a day later getting chicken pox. You’re going to struggle because you’re never working at your highest level and with every disease you dig deeper into your need to recover.

A victim of not enough rest?

Baseball pitchers that have to get Tommy John surgery fall into this category. Take Stephen Strasburg for example. He got hurt less than one year into his MLB career. Eric Cressey theorizes that it’s not so much a mechanics issue as it is him having to always showcase his talents. When you’re always looking to light up the radar gun with triple digits you never get a chance to slow down.

The third, and final, reason injuries occur is because of a combination of both of the above. This is where most are apt to blame strength imbalances, but notice that it’s nothing about strength in the traditional sense. I break this reason into two categories:

1) Mobility impairment that force your body into bad positions. If your thoracic spine is all bottled up, your upper body isn’t going to handle things very well. Same goes for your hips and lower body.

2) Bad motor patterning that stresses muscles out of sequence. This is essentially my theory of knee pain. The muscles nearest the center of our body are designed to do the bulk of movement. When the smaller muscles take over, they stress themselves more than what they are designed for.  This, in my opinion, is how most tendonitis starts. When the smaller muscles start to do more than the bigger muscles, you’re going to have problems.

A foot strike way in front of the body puts a lot of responsibility on the hamstring.

A prime case for this is Jose Reyes, who is prone to hamstring injuries. It might be easy to blame all of his problems on hamstring strength, but as Carl Valle explains, the problem is more likely due to his mechanics. (Read more in the blog post, More on Footstrike: Jose Reyes and Hamstring Injuries).

CONCLUSION

If you want to say that injuries are caused by “imbalances,” I probably couldn’t argue. But the moment you bring up strength imbalances, we’re going to have some problems.But I’ll leave you with this these thoughts.

We always have been and always will be imbalanced creatures. Total symmetry just doesn’t happen. From the moment we’re born something is off. We open the pickle jar better with a certain hand. We have a dominant hand for fine motor control. We (might) have uneven abs, ruining our high school dream of having a perfect six-pack.

 

My abs are imbalanced, noooooooo.

Aside from taking care of your soft tissue restrictions, extreme structural imbalances, and doing a few things right in the weight room, you live and die by your imbalances. The only way to truly have balance is to become equally proficient on both sides of a traditional unilateral movement. So if you’re a pitcher, you’d have match your pitch count with your right and left hand. But you’ll never get anywhere if you did that. It doesn’t leave time to specialize and master the craft.

Now even though these are my could-be’s and should-be’s, here are some things I know for sure: Tiger Woods doesn’t swing the club left handed, Michael Jordan didn’t take game winning perimeter shots left handed, and Roger Federer doesn’t hold the racket in his left hand. I’m sure they don’t regret their imbalances. Will you?

 

Athlete Training – How Strong Do I Need To Be, and Is There Strong Enough?

by

The strength and conditioning industry – all things considered – is booming. Now, more than ever, teams are hiring professional “performance enhancers.” You would think that we would be at an all-time-knowledge-high.

And we are. I guess. People are smarter now than they have ever been. But, really, this doesn’t mean much. Below is a paraphrase from one of the best coaches in the industry, Buddy Morris, from back in 2005 (around 7:25 in the video below). “Even with all of the latest and greatest training methods, the average time improvement in the 100m dash is .00512 second per year.”

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JCzQ8k_7Rjs&feature=relmfu

But even though there are a few spotlights, some athletes – even of world class – are in the dark. Take Usain Bolt for example.

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KOC7O9JOY3Y&feature=related

The fastest man in the world doing…explosive reverse curls? There isn’t enough hip bend to consider this a “power clean.” I feel bad for him, actually. But it shows you that great athletes will be great, regardless of how they train their general capacities.

What athletes should and shouldn’t do in the weight room is a book in itself, and its contents would vary depending on what coach would be writing.

Because of the term “strength” and “conditioning,” those two things are all the industry cares about. So when the head coach hires his buddy that has no real training knowledge, things can get ugly. Weight becomes more important than form. Exercises are chosen based on appearance and not effectiveness.

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAfdY03MXC8&feature=related

I used to think that an athlete could never have too much strength. Even now, I guess it’s true. But the problem is that an athlete with too much strength is probably spending too much time in the weight room.

Outside of Powerlifters and Olympic Weightlifters, the strongest athletes aren’t the best athletes. I can hear your panties twisting right now, but hear me out.

All – and I mean all – sports are a combination of general and specific skills. Strength, for most sports, is a general attribute. It’s nice to have, but it isn’t necessary. A strong squat may help you drive the ball further in baseball, but it’s not going to give you the coordination necessary to make contact. Barry Bonds was a hall of famer before he took a run at the homerun record.

And since strength is nice to have, getting it is fine as long as it doesn’t interfere with your ability to play or practice your sport. A Rippetoe inspired 5×5 squat volume workout is going to make the next few days miserable. You can’t practice when your legs are that fatigued. Save that kind of training for Powerlifters.

Now if you’re a 300lb lineman that doesn’t have the strength to fend off attackers, then maybe you need a bit more strength. In this instance, strength is a little more “specific” to the position, making it a little more important. But even still, you can’t forget about the more specific skills like footwork and blocking techniques.

If you can squat 500lbs, and you’re a bench warmer, get out of the weight room and start practicing your sport and your technique. If you play a physical sport and are getting manhandled, you might want to make sure you’ve got enough strength to throw around your opponent. It’s kind of that simple.

The base behind all of this is that you need to be a good athlete, regardless of strength levels. And being strong doesn’t make you a good athlete. If it did, more Powerlifters would be in the NFL as linemen.

Nevertheless, there are athletes like Desean Jackson that are naturally explosive, and other athletes that need a bit more strength to make up for their genetic inadequacies. But how you get “strong” is another topic.

Does it matter which type of squat an athlete does? No, probably not. Back, front, zercher, spider bar, box, whatever. They’re all doing the same thing, and that’s strengthening a squatting movement pattern.

For most athletes I think Kelly Baggett’s Vertical Jump Formula is a good target to shoot for. He says the day you’ll be satisfied with your vertical jump is the day you can:

A: Can squat double bodyweight

B: At 10% or less body-fat

C: With the movement efficiency to jump back and forth over a midshin level cone or string 20 times in 10 seconds.

How you get to those numbers is up in the air as long as it’s not interfering with your sport work. Now, I’ll be the first to admit that not everyone has to squat heavy so take what you want from it. But if you can hit A, B, and C, you’re not a chump. You’ll be fit for most tasks.

Now, I’m nearly killing myself for ending this here because this recommendation is a blanket, not to mention how loosely I’ve been using “athlete.” William the Refrigerator Perry certainly didn’t have less than 10% body fat and he turned in a fine NFL career. So take what you want from all of this, knowing that the rules change for every sport and every position within the sport.

SPECIFIC NUMBERS

It’s difficult for me to throw out numbers because the process isn’t that easy. Your athletic career isn’t locked if you meet A, B, and C above, but I’ll tell you that if you accomplish them you’ll have a competitive advantage – from a strength and conditioning perspective – against someone of the same skill level that doesn’t have them (as long as they apply). By the same restriction, not all athletes need to do the Powerlifts or Olympic Lifts.

Having said that, I’m going to do my best to throw numbers out there that make “sense,” using frequently used lifts. Meaning that if an athlete came to me complaining that they couldn’t make the team with these statistics, and blamed their (lack of a) career on not being strong, I’d punch them in the face.

Deadlift: 2.5x bw

Back Squat: 2x bw

Power Clean 1.75 x bw

Bench Press 1.5 x bw

Chin-Up 1.5 x bw or 25 reps @ bw

Overhead Press 1 x bw

Now, one of the reasons I created this post was because I got a question from a reader that asked me to discuss what the relationship between lifts should be. But, really, outside of the five above, I can’t say much.

I can’t say that if you back squat 315, that you should be able to front squat 275. I can’t say that being able to bench press 315 will allow you to do a planche, because the movements are different, the force angles are different, and the muscular contraction are different. Really, I can’t even say that benching 1.5 x bw allows you to overhead press anything more than 0.5 x bw because of how different they are. And part of this is because I don’t believe that an athlete needs to do both deadlifts and squats. Or both kinds of pressing. Or even power cleans.

Truthfully, you shouldn’t be looking for ideal ratios. The body is going to adapt to whatever you throw it’s way so if you bench frequently with no regard for rowing, you’ll be a better bencher than rower.

Look at what your sport consists of, and decide what lifts are most beneficial. Then do what you can do make those lifts as good as they can be to benefit you. Most of all, take a look at how strong you really need to be, and if strength is really your limiting factor. How much upper body strength does a soccer player need, really?

But, trust me. There’s certainly “strong enough.”

How to Gauge Progression and Abilities – The Football Theory of Life

by

As opening  week of the NFL commenced, I can confidently say that I’m glad there wasn’t a lockout. I don’t know why the sport is so addicting, but it captivates millions of fans – myself included – every Sunday.

I think it might the precision of the game, at least, for me. Quarterbacks lead receivers by passing through the hands and bodies of defenders. Receivers run their routes so precise their foot strikes appears geometrically pre-calculated. Offensive linemen exert the strength bring a 300 pound human exploding into their chest to a dead stop.

The game is intertwined with so many subplots, much like a novel or a movie. How the defense reacts to the offense. How the quarterback handles the safety with his eyes. How the running backs navigates through bodies often twice their size. Everything is inspiring.

But some think the talent and skills displayed in the NFL are out of reach, shrugging off their abilities by claiming superior genetics or the use of performance enhancing drugs.

Both are probably true in some ways. Although I could argue that the genetics factor doesn’t exist.

But even if they are true, that they do have genetics and pharmaceuticals on their side, I want you consider The Football Theory of Life.

It’s easy to be awed by the physiques and abilities of those in the NFL, claiming impossibility for an average person. But it’s also easy to overlook the totality of their training. Those that tout genetics need to watch a high school football game.

Most don’t come out of the womb with superpowers. Their physique and skill are a result of what they are exposed to during their development.

Consider a football player that joins the team his freshman year of high school. Most high school football teams have mandatory lifting sessions, no matter how bad the program or the equipment is. If the student takes athletics seriously, he’ll likely do one of two things in the off season: he will work out, or he will play another sport.

Come senior year, he will have four years of lifting and activity on his side. In college, he’ll likely specialize in one sport that forces him to become more structured with training and lifting. That means he’ll have another four years of more serious experience. Upon consideration for the NFL, he’ll have eight years of total experience, and eight years of practice.

But it doesn’t end there. Something happens to rookie and second year players in the NFL. They seem to get bigger, stronger, and faster. Blame it on drugs or genetics, but that’s ten years of intensie physical activity and lifting to that point. Until you devote ten years to something, don’t tell me about genetics or steroids.

So what we’re left with are year markers. The first year you get involvedwith something, you’re only a freshman in high school. It may be writing, it may be swimming, it may be training clients, whatever. You’re new, stupid, immature, and clumsy.

Even in your fourth year, you’re still in high school. Still immature, although you certainly have grown. But you’re still in high school.

Now, your fifth year you grow a little more but you’re only half developed. Many of you have only been training for 1-3 years, let alone five. And in year five, you’re only half way there. A freshman in college.

As you get to your seventh and eighth year, you’ll know whether or not you’ll be successful. You’ll know if you have what it takes. But that doesn’t mean you stop developing. If you keep going to your ninth year you are — for all intents and purposes — a professional. And in your tenth year, you’re at the apex.

What I’m telling you is that even if you’re five years deep into an athletic commitment and not where you would like to be, don’t quit. You’re only a freshman in college. Take what you have learned and apply it to the next half of your journey.

Don’t determine success in the short term. So you had a bad month, let alone day, suck it up. Get back on track and everything will be OK.

A little shot out to the tricksters that read this blog: If you have a mental block preventing you from trying a backflip or any trick, don’t berate yourself for it. You’re just killing your confidence. Look at the long term. Learn as much as you can and get it when you’re comfortable.

Remember the high school kid that plays three sports. You don’t make it to the NFL without eight years of training, and you don’t fully mature until your tenth year. So whether you’re trying to lose weight, gain muscle, or become more athletic, measure yourself in something other than days.

And most importantly, don’t say something is impossible or make excuses until you devote ten years of dedicated practice on it. Because, after all, that’s the Football Theory of Life.

Lifting Everyday – How to Return from High Frequency Lifting Programs

by

Stop biting your nails. Stop abusing caffeine. Put the toilet seat down. Visit your grandmother. Clean your house. Stop binge drinking. Stop cussing. Don’t have dessert. Don’t drink soft drinks. Stop gambling.

Stop every habit you have, and do it this very second.

Yeah, right.

On the low end it takes 18 days to change a behavior into a habit. The high end? 224 days.

This means that while I was practicing and preaching high frequency programs, I was creating a habit. One that has proven difficult to break. Both of the programs I frequently cited meet the 18 day limit. Dan John’s was 40 days. Chad Waterbury’s was 60 days. Considering I didn’t start them simultaneously, I had about 80 straight days of exercising. There was a vacation thrown in there, but I’m not counting that because I usually disengage from reality during those. But the day I returned, I was back into my routine. Solidifying the habit of exercising daily.

I had my fair share of hangs from a pull-up bar.

The concept of exercising daily can be misleading. I’m not talking about a light walk in the park. In fact, a light day for me was a minimum of fifty pull-ups, pushups, and goblet squats, at least ten minutes of handstand practice, deadlifts, and presses. On my light day.

Most would consider than insane, but the body adapts. This is one of the best reasons to train every day. You don’t know what your body is capable of until you push it to extremes. When you do, you find out how silly you can be. You find out that most times, it’s your mind – not your body – that holds you back. And of any condition – be it physical, mental, or emotional –you have, nothing taxes your motivation quite like dreary weather does. Those are the kind of things you learn.

But it starts to consume you. I can’t say when, or how, but it just does. You feel like you have to do something every day or else you’re a failure. After all, gymnasts train daily. So do Olympic Weightlifters. They have amazing physiques, skills, and strengths. Don’t you want those things? Then why aren’t you training every day?

It’s those kinds of things that run through your mind as you watch the rain drops teeter down your window like lightning bolts, trying to find motivation from somewhere.

If you’re looking for ways to stop these thoughts, I can’t say that I know of one. But here are some things to think about if your compulsions are eating away at your mind.

Out of necessity.

GYMNASTS train often because they are working on skills. Just go back and check out my Interview with Yuri Marmerstein. “Handbalancing has a slow learning curve,” he said, “taking a day off requires a day to get back in balance and by then I’ve lost two training days.”

They also don’t do the same thing every day. There are different events that need to be practiced, giving some movements and muscles a chance to recover.  But handstands aren’t really draining, so they are more apt to frequent training.

PERSONALLY, ditching daily training was tough because I saw impressive results. But looking back, there is no reliable progressions. That’s not to say that it can’t happen, but that it’s more difficult. When you train less the goal becomes more focused. If you are only given one day per week to train, you know you’re going to have to do meaningful work. But when you go in every day, it becomes less about progress and the motions. At what point would I get sick of doing ten sets of pull-ups? Sure, my arms, shoulders, and back responded well because they had to. But when would I be able to do five sets of twenty repetitions? Would I just be stuck with ten sets of ten for the rest of my life?

THE LONG RUN is more important than the short one. For every case of high frequency training working, there are people like Martin Berkhan and JC Deen that use a lower frequency to get freakish results. If you can spend 50% less time in the gym and see the same results then why not?

IF YOU WANT to continue high frequency training, train five days a week. Use your rest days to relax and enjoy life. Get used to letting the body recovery. The world won’t explode.

AN ALTERNATIVE to training with such a high frequency is to mesh everything together into a more “normal” routine. I have a lot of ideas when it comes to this, and when I can finally train with gymnastics rings I’m sure I’ll have many more. But here are some rules. After every set of presses and squats, do a comfortable amount of pull-ups. After every set of pulls and deadlifts, do a comfortable amount of push-ups. If eight is a “comfortable amount” for you, and you do five sets of presses, you just added 40 pull-ups that you wouldn’t have otherwise done. If you do that in between every set, the numbers add up.

IF THAT DOESN’T suit you well, then you can follow a more traditional three or four day split that would normally give you two days of rest back to back. For example M-W-F or S-M-W-Th. On your first rest day do a bodyweight blast, where you do nothing but a ton of pull-ups, push-ups, handstands, or whatever you want (or anything that you normally did with a high frequency). It would look like, S (upper) – M (lower) – W (upper) – Th (lower) – F (bodyweight).

THE BODY RESPONDS well to such a high frequency because it’s a “shock” technique. While effective, they should be used sporadically, just as Dan John suggests. They aren’t something that the body should adapt to, because once that happens they aren’t really that “shocking” anymore.

YOUR GAINS won’t wither away once you stop training daily. Strength and hypertrophy can be maintained with much less than what they are built with. Your mind will cause regression faster than your physical abilities will realistically deteriorate. What I mean by this is that the more you make yourself think you need to train every day, the more you will need to train everyday. The more you think your muscles dwindle away on a rest day, the less effective the recovery process will be. Don’t think of rest as a bad thing. Think of it as an essential time for the muscles to rebuild. Feed them. Take naps. Enjoy life. Spend time with your friends. Get the stress out of your life.

MY LAST TIP is to make the warm up a part of the workout. Hit thirty to fifty reps of the movements that you obsessed over during your high frequency run. Keep them brief with little rest to get the heart rate up. For example, I do three circuits of pull-ups, push-ups, and goblet squats for ten repetitions before I touch a barbell, whether it be an upper body or lower body day.

I can’t say that I have this figured out yet. But I’ve always had a love for bodyweight skills, and I can’t get enough of them. Use the tips and information to close the chapter of daily training for now. At least, mentally, that’s what I’m doing. But I’m sure somewhere in my life, I’ll need to come back to this.

Think you have other solutions? Think I’m insane? Obsessive? Idiotic? Whatever, I’d love to hear what you have to say. Hit up the comment box below.

Why Your Mind is Holding You Back – Stop Thinking, See Progress

by

Of the problems that you can encounter, your mind holds you back the most. No, it’s not your injuries. No, it’s not your equipment. No, it’s not your program. It’s not anything you want to think it is, because you don’t want to blame yourself. No one does. That’s why you pointed fingers on the playground in elementary school. That’s why you lie to people you love.

But it’s time to change that. It’s time to grow some good old fashion cojones, and say it. It’s all my fault.

I was watching a YouTube video of an athlete training for football. He was doing things that, if I were in his place, I would never do. Ladder drills, cone drills, and banded ankle resistance were among the list of taboos.

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aowB5wNPvWQ

But he probably doesn’t know any better, and is probably just mimicking a college program. Maybe he even paid to have one designed for him.

He doesn’t know the blueprints. He doesn’t know that ladder drills keep your vision downward even though that never happens in the game. He doesn’t know that they are predetermined movement patterns, the opposite of what the game requires.

But even though I’m saying these things aren’t good, there’s one thing that this athlete has that you don’t. His mind isn’t holding him back. He’s not questioning the methods. He’s just going out there and performing. This lets him focus and concentrate more than you can.

I don’t want to say this, but it’s true. The more you know, the harder it is to train yourself. Details destroy you. And if you’re having doubts about your training, the best way to fix it is to stop immediately. I don’t care if you’re in the middle of something. If you’re having doubts, your gains will always be subpar.

Next, pick a proven program that will meet your goals from someone you trust. For the next six months (or however long it’s duration is), follow it blindly. Pretend God made the program and it never failed.

Don’t question anything. Just follow. There’s no, “can I substitute…” You can’t unless it blatantly allows it. If it’s written down, it’s there for a reason. If it’s not there, don’t pencil it in yourself.

It sounds good so far, so you probably have a few free programs in your mind that you’re going to check out when you’re done reading this. But I’m going to blow your mind right here. If you’ve been really confused and your workouts lack motivation, don’t settle for free content. Go buy something. I don’t care if it costs $100. In fact, I hope it does because you’re going to be more apt to follow it with heart. You’re not really paying for the program, you’re paying for mental clarity.

It’s tough creating a program for yourself. Hell, I always try to do everything at the same time. So I’ve put together some resources to help you get out of your fog. It may seem like I’m selling you out, trying to get you to buy thing. Yes, I am. But only because that’s the entire point of it. I’m not making commission, and I haven’t even seen what all of the programs entail. But I trust the people on these lists, and I’m confident that their products are effective.

FOR FAT LOSS

My two fat loss masters are John Romaniello and Craig Ballantyne. These guys have been around for a long time, and their products – Final Phase Fat Loss and Turbulence Training – do so well there is no way to refute them. I also like Ross Enamait’s unconventional methods, so check out Full Throttle Conditioning.

There are others in the industry like Tom Venuto and Joel Marion, and tens – possibly hundreds – after these guys. But I’d be here for days if I listed them all.

TRAINING

Everyone has their own training product. There’s Nate Green’s Hero Workout, John Romaniello’s Superhero Workout, Jason Ferruggia’s Muscle Gaining Secrets, Kelly Baggett’s No Bull Muscle Building Program, Jim Smith’s Accelerated Muscular Development, Zach Even-Esh’s Underground Strength System, Ross Enamait’s Never Gymless and, again, I could go on.

FREEBIES

Before I help you here, I’m going to warn you. Even though these programs are sound, picking one will make doubt seep into your mind easier because you aren’t investing anything into them.

DeFranco has WS4SB, Kelly Bagget has the Ultimate Split, Zazh Even-Esh has Freak Strength and Bodyweight Bodybuilding, and that’s only to name a few.

And, if you want, I’m always here for both free and paid consultations.

CONCLUSION

Doubt does more than damage than you think. It interferes with your focus and doesn’t allow you to fully engage in your training. Don’t let your mind hold you back anymore. Invest some time (and maybe some money if you have to) in finding something that will sustain your psyche for the next six months. Become a drone and work hard. You won’t regret it.

The Overhead Press Conundrum

by

For those of you looking for a definitive way to overhead press, you’re not going to find it here (yet). In fact, this post is a cry for help. A cry to anyone that is willing to respond. Because, for the first time, I’m unsure about the overhead press.

I haven’t always felt this way. Three months ago, I would have showed you how to perform it. Told you it’s benefits. But now, I’m not as confident, which is why I’m reaching out to others. I’d like to hear your opinion, so make sure you comment if you have something to say.

BIT OF HISTORY

I had a few mentors when I dived in the online fitness community. Looking back, I pestered them a lot. But, luckily, they answered promptly even if they were annoyed. Perhaps my most influential was a gentleman named Adam Wehmann. He logged his training over at John Stone’s website and his progress was inspiring. As any fan boy would do, I pounded him with questions. I’m fairly certain – although not distinctly positive – that I started to ask more questions than he was willing to answer.

He told me to check out a book. I looked into the – at the time – obscure text. At least, compared to how popular it is today. The author didn’t have multiple books, his own forum, or his own DVD. Mark Rippetoe was living a quiet life in Wichita Falls, simply following through with an idea spawned during a conversation with Glenn Pendlay.

So when I added Starting Strength to my cart, I was a little skeptical. But when it arrived, I was hooked. Not only was it easy to follow, but also everything just seemed to make sense. I took it as gospel. Since then, my views have changed. I’m more open minded to things, because I’m more knowledgeable.

But of the five lifts explained in the book, I never – until recently – questioned his view of the overhead press. I was sure he was right about it. He had to be. Hell, I debated with a fellow student (he was anti-overhead pressing) about its safety in front  of an undergraduate class. I even brought out the big guns. A CrossFit Journal article entitled, The Safety and Efficacy of Overhead Pressing.

All was fine until this summer. I was throwing more. A lot more. Overhead work was cutting into my recovery. At the beginning of my season, there were nights that I would lay in bed as my shoulder throbbed in pain. I had to ditch pressing. And even though my arm feels immaculate and has never been this strong, I want to know if I was doing something wrong. Could I really have had bad form?

THE CONTROVERSY

I’m not questioning the use of the overhead press. I love the lift. I’d do it every day if I could. And that’s why I’m on this mission. To find out how to overhead press. The killer is that I know I can because I do a lot of overhead supports and waiter walks. The lockout feels amazing. I can feel the stabilization, the thoracic spine opening up, and the shoulders growing. Surprisingly, I can even handle the eccentric portion. Enough of my shortcomings though, because you’ve got to be wondering what this article is about.

My question is this: do the shoulders shrug or stay packed in the lockout position?

Shrugged at lockout.

As with any controversial issue, it’s split. The one side – the Rippetoe side – uses a shrug at the lockout position. They say it fully engages the rotator cuff and tilts the scapula, preventing impingement. The other side – the kettlebeller side – keeps the shoulder back and down. They call it a packed position.

I’ve been on a silent mission these past few months to see how professionals overhead press. But I’ve yet to come across a comprehensive explanation of how to press with packed shoulders.

Mike Robertson seems to agree that the shrug is an essential part of the press, even though he doesn’t come out and say it. It can be inferred, however, based on his thoracic mobility dealings in Long Live the Overhead Press and his use of the overhead shrug in Push-Ups, Facpulls, and Shrugs.

It’s no surprise that Dan John prefers the packed position since he is a big proponent of kettlebells. I e-mailed him once, asking him if there were any references to overhead pressing with a packed shoulder and he responded with something like, “every Strength and Health magazine.”

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Q78IQdI52M

Others like Zach Even-Esh and Jason Ferrugia use the overhead press seemingly more than the bench press, but whether they prefer shoulders packed or shrug is never discussed. It appears that, however, that Jason keeps them packed, while Zach uses a shrug. Can’t know for sure though.

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXAlIPyKR3s&feature=channel_video_title

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uucszJRyOWw

Looking at old footage, when the press was more popular, it seems most press from a packed position which is in line with what Dan John said.

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7erVblY7aiU

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3nJrYPVJ88M

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vs8svOg9c9o

Yet a lot of modern footage suggests that a shrug is paramount during a jerk. In most Olympic Weightlifting, the shrug at lockout is easy to pick up on because the head tilts down and falls in-between the outstretched arms.

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cOoP5yX1bZ4

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZEVfSKbGlU

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TqsiykYN720

And as much as I hate to go here, these videos make it seem like the shrugged position is a more stable position. After all, it’s what most Olympic Lifters do. Could the shrug be a more modern and effective way to stabilize the lockout position? Or is only of use if you’re jerking the weight?

WHAT OTHERS SAY

I already started to reach out to others to see what they have to say. But I’m going to keep gathering and post it at all at once. If you can, do me a favor and reach out to those that you know – or even to the professionals in the industry – and show them this post. Let me know what their response is because I’m eagar to see what the results will be. Until then, let me know what you believe. What’s it going to be? Packed or shrugged?