Do you know about the Great Eight Exercises for the X Physique?
Click here for more information.

Skinny Fat Ectomorph

How to Prevent Skinny-Fat Scars (AKA: Don’t End Up Like Me)

The Skinny-Fat Solution

Before we talk about building an “X” physique, sending salutation to stubborn body fat, and surmounting skinny-fat syndrome forever with my freshly released resource, The Skinny-Fat Solution, you need to know some things about me…things most people would keep secret if they were in my shoes…things most people would call scars and would most certainly be embarrassed of.

Early emotional scars

Pepperoni grease glided down my throat as I tore open a package of Pop-Tarts. My gaze was fixed beyond the full wall glass window pane and onto an open field of grass. Open grass fields are an opportunistic safe haven for tricksters. Much like an artist paints on canvas, backyard tricksters paint on fresh green grass fields with an array of flips, twists, and kicks. And it was a place I called home for four years.

Ah, yes. Four years ago. That was when two girls whispered back and forth a few desks ahead of me in Algebra class, peering scantily in my direction. It was one of the few times in my adolescent life that I mustered the stones to talk to a female. And the end result was likely why I chose to neglect female interaction prior.

“You have girl boobs.”

Music to my ears.

The last few crumbs of the deliciously processed carbohydrates rode down my esophagus like a surfer, likely using the pepperoni grease as a wave. But I was still hungry. The pizza (Penn State has good pizza, I recall) and Pop-Tarts didn’t cut it. My mind was telling me to buy another bag of Pop-Tarts. So was my stomach. But my eyes were focused on the green grass field.

My past—my life—was slowly fading in and out. I remembered the Algebra incident, the self confidence issues, the stretch marks. And just as I was going to get a second bag of Pop-Tarts, the realization materialized.

What the hell am I doing?

Moving into physical scars (stretch marks)

For years I struggled to cope with the mirror’s truth: my skinny-fat body. And I was shoving Pop-Tarts down my throat? It had been my dream to turn my skinny-fat body into something…better…ever since religiously watching Dragon Ball Z. The show shaped my desire to build an “X” physique—a body proportion that was opposite of mine.

Where I had string bean arms, a sunken upper chest, dilapidated deltoids, and cheerio sized wrists (consider the propensity to sew satchels of fat around the waistline “whipped topping”), Dragon Ball Z characters had broad shoulders that funneled into a smaller waist with no excess body fat.

My body belonged to a menopausal woman, not a strapping young lad. Ironically enough, I came to this conclusion as I was uncontrollably eating Hot Fries and chugging Mountain Dew Code Red.

(Geeky aside: For example, I was set on looking like Super Saiyan Broly, rather than Bio Broly. It’s all about proportion – one of the many things The Skinny-Fat Solution addresses with the “X” physique training program and upper chest guide. It’s totally rational to base your physique and existence on cartoon characters, by the way.)

Broly AnthonyMychal.com

This is all very important for two reasons:

First, I know what you’re going through. Unlike others in this field, I wasn’t born with a Mr. Miyagi family member that “taught me the ways” when I was five years old. And I didn’t learn how train during my “high school football days.”  (My high school days consisted of Dragon Ball Z, Runescape, Super Smash Brothers, Zelda, Star Wars, and other assorted video games and animes.) I’m not a physical wunderkind. I didn’t play any sports for my high school. While I have credentials, I’m proud not to spout them. I enjoyed working with NFL athletes, and I enjoy writing for magazines, but my garage is my gym, and my backyard is my “home field.”

A good friend of mine trains professional athletes. We joked about how relatively weak I am compared to a lot of hardcore strength folk. He mentioned taking steroids, which was undoubtedly followed by, “Scared money don’t make none.” I told him I didn’t know the first thing about steroids, really. Since he works with athletes, he has to know about them, else he loses credibility. (I worked in a college setting, not private setting, which eliminated the PED need-to-know.) But being “natural” and “normal” has always something I’ve been proud to hinge myself on.

Second, time wasted is time lost. That picture below? That’s my lower back and shoulder.

Anthony Mychal Skinny-Fat Stretch Marks

I started tricking in 2002ish. I was motivated enough to trick, but not so motivation to work on body composition. And in 2006, I was still skinny-fat. Still miserable. For four years I let my body get further “damaged.” I not only allowed stretch marks grow, but also facilitated their growth. They’re still there to this day. I don’t pay them mention. But they’re there.

Which brings me to The Skinny-Fat Solution.

The Down Low on The Skinny-Fat Solution

Contrary to popular belief, the Solution to skinny-fat syndrome isn’t just a program. It’s not just schlepping down a fancy table with exercises, sets, and reps and creating a PDF’ed training routine. I mean, it’s partly that. You need to train. But it’s more so embracing a journey. It’s about how skinny-fat syndrome affects your life — no one talks about the why of it all. Why is skinny-fat syndrome such a big deal?

  • The mental issues of being out of proportion.
  • The social issues of getting picked on (in my case, being told I had “girl boobs”).
  • Being called “skinny” and “lanky,” but feeling puffy and fat. (This is honestly what ate at me the most.)

For me (and probably for you) fixing your physical self is a gateway to a better life. And this is something I want you to realize for yourself. People are surprised when I personally respond to their emails, but it’s the least I can do. I want to see you break free. (My email address is at the end of this post. Feel free to say hello.)

I want you to be smarter than everyone else out there. (Those that read my blog are 49.4% smarter than everyone else, recent research suggests, so we’re getting somewhere.) I don’t want you to fall for eight week solutions. I don’t want you to buy miracle pills. I want to see you succeed in the long term.

I’m not going to sit here and pretend like looking “hawt” is the only thing that matters in the world. Your friends and spouse will like you regardless of how you look. But this isn’t about them. This is about you. This is about how you feel about yourself.

I created The Skinny-Fat Solution specifically for skinny-fat sufferers; everything inside is tailored to those that live like I once did.

Don’t let others tell you what you should want

Here’s the thing: even after I dove into training, I was still skinny-fat askew. Since I’m a mesh of performance and physique, I neglected the physique gig because I let other people tell me what I should want. I neglected biceps curls. I squatted myself to death, even though I was on the verge of depression with chronic knee pain.

I was brainwashed into thinking training for aesthetics was vane and narcissistic — an idea spread by those that get up on stage to showcase physical strength. (Not that there’s anything wrong with that. The bottom line here is that it’s all personal. It’s all about breaking personal barriers, regardless of what you’re improving: strength, physique, performance, etc…)

What you want is unique to you — unique to the events that shaped your life. No one has lived your life, so don’t let anyone tell you what you should want. No one knows your emotional toils. If you want to look seriously well built, don’t let anyone tell you otherwise.

The Skinny-Fat Solution is the only thing out there made for a skinny-fat sufferer, by a skinny-fat sufferer. And it was designed specifically for conquering skinny-fat demons, be it physical scarring, emotional scarring, or otherwise. I share your scars. And I want you to either prevent them all together, or stop them from growing further.

Looking back, The Skinny-Fat Solution is what I would have handed myself oh-so long ago. Perhaps if it had existed, you wouldn’t been seeing “my scars” here today. Consider it your gain. And check out The Skinny-Fat Solution if this is all something you’re interested in. Regardless, I welcome you to my inbox to say hello. Send me praise, prose, or malice. Pull down your pants and drop a dookie if that’s your style.

anthony.mychal -at- gmail -dot- com

Just remember: every day you dance around your desired dream, you’re potentially creating scars. Now is your time to stop that from happening.

The Skinny on What The 40 Day Program and PLP Did to Skinny-Fat Syndrome

Be sure to read Part I, Why and How I Combined The 40 Day Program and The PLP Program, and Part II, Some Results and Q&A About Combining The 40 Day Program and the PLP Program, before reading this.

A question that frequents my inbox:

“Well…are you still skinny-fat? Sometimes you say you are. Other times you say you’re “formerly” skinny-fat. What gives?”

Good question.

Body composition is a symbol in more ways than one.

Not only does it symbolize the kind of life you live, but it also symbolizes the state of your physiology.

Physiology forms from many factors. With body composition, it kinda boils down to genetics, training, and nutrition. Of course this is an overly simplified look at things. But sometimes overly simple is a good thing.

Genetics form the base “code.” But the code is also influenced by environment — which is shaped by culture.

Doesn’t matter if you have skinny genes if you go ahead and down five gallons of Coke every day. Combine that with a lack of physical activity and you’re in a bad place. (Probably in a bad place regardless of physical activity.)

Once you work your way into a tricky situation, you gotta fight your genetics to get out.

Combine overeating on terrible things and lack of physical activity with a physiology not genetically primed for muscle growth and you get no muscular development and a lot of fat development.

Enter skinny-fat.

“But since you have the genetics for skinny, wouldn’t it be easy to lose weight?”

No. Not really.

Overly processed foods and soda make it easy to vandalize genetics. Eating 600 grams of potatoes is tough stuff. But 600 grams of sugar via soda? Less so.

Then you face the reality of physiology: Fat cells don’t really disappear. They just shrink. I once heard that an emptied fat cell takes about ten years to fully die off. (Believe I got this from John Kiefer.)

Here’s the example of myself:

I was born to be skinny. Didn’t have a touch of fat on me. But as I grew I developed the “fat” part — poor nutrition and lack of physical activity (among other things).

So my genetics are hardwired for skinny. But physiology is more than genetics. Otherwise you’d be impossible to change.

So it’s like this: I may not look skinny-fat anymore. But I’m still hardwired to fill up my fat cells when I overeat, just as I’m genetically hardwired to be skinny.

Hence skinny-fatness.

What the combination did for skinny-fatness

I’ve been hinting that combining The 40 Day Program and PLP program did “something” that altered my skinny-fat propensity. It worked against my “code.” This goes back to an article I wrote earlier this year: Skinny-Fatness, Hardgainers, and High Frequency Training.

Training often forces your body to adapt a certain way. (As long as you don’t overdo it and injure yourself.) Even if your genetics “go against” the adaptation.

If you do 2370 chin-ups over 60 days, does your body have a choice as to whether or not it can adapt?

No.

It has to.

By constantly living in an environment that demands muscular contractions and moving your body through space (of which body fat is a factor), you’re “hinting” at “needing” a certain physiology—a physiology that contrasts what most skinny-fat people have.

Just as overfeeding on gushers fruit snacks (used to love those things, especially the sour kind) can derail genetic propensity, so can training.

Put yourself in a position in which the body doesn’t have a choice. Put your body in a position in which it has to adapt in a way that contrasts your current physiology.

The tricky part is doing this and living to talk about it. (Staying injury free.)

But as you still skinny-fat as an intermediate?

Another common idea is that no one “strong” is skinny-fat. And that to cure skinny-fatness you only need to get “strong.”

Not true.

“Strong” is a relative term. But when the picture above was taken I could squat 405 pounds at about 190 pound body weight. Yet I had a “soft” appearance.

Right now I can squat 325 for mediocre 5. Not overly difficult. (My foot gives me the fritz. I’m hoping my new Nike Romaleos help my Morton’s Neuroma.)

And yet here’s a picture taken of me at around 205 pounds. And then you can even compare these to when I weighed about 190 in the midst of my PLP and 40 Day Program extravaganza.

I’m “weaker” in both the squat and bench press. Yet I look better and am undoubtedly more muscular.

Just some food for thought…

Is this…blasphemy?

I love squats. I’ve done a lot of them. I squat often. But here are somethings to think about:

  • I haven’t squatted anything above 405 since that picture above was taken. (Hurt my back on the third rep.)
  • Haven’t benched anything more than 245 since the picture. (Was my max at the time of the picture.)

Yet I was able to gain 15+ pounds of lean body mass.

What gives?

How have I gained muscle without getting that much stronger on two exercises that most would consider necessary?

Because at some point — when you can stress the body enough — sheer volume over time is enough to churn adaptation.

And if you’re doing this right, everything else trickles into place. You get stronger. You gain muscle. You get better.

Interested in learning more?

Good.

Are you a skinny-fat soldier?

This idea of getting better on account of sheer volume — just showing up — is all about basic stress and adaptation. The way you live, the way you train, and the way you eat come together to “nudge” your body in certain directions.

You can even add more to the list. How you sleep. How you deal with stressful situations. How you perceive yourself.

All of it funnels down and contributes to the “nudging.” The key is doing the right things to nudge it in the direction that opposes skinny-fatness. This includes doing the right lifts in the gym. Eating the right foods at the right times. Doing the right things in life.

How your body adapts in response to all of this is the cornerstone of The Skinny-Fat Solution.

The Skinny-Fat Solution is the resource I hinted to in my last article — the one that would be available early at a discounted price pending on whether or not I wanted to accept charter members.

I’m here.

You’re here.

Yeah, let’s do it.

Charter members will help refine and shape the product. They’d also gain access to a private Facebook Group where I’d give regular feedback and coaching advice.

Here are the full details:

  • There’s going to be a soft launch where I only allow a limited amount of people to purchase. This is because I’ll be soliciting feedback. I’m only one man and can only handle so many questions. So this isn’t like a lot of internet dudes that claim there’s only 20 *products* available and you have to “act now.” Really? Dude, you’re selling a PDF. There’s infinite quantities. What gives?
  • Buyers will be invited to a private Facebook Group where the discussions and coaching will take place. Questions will be encouraged. As a charter member, you’re expected to help shape the final product. You’ll also be updated on the product’s progress. So you’ll see glimpses of the design process and back end stuff.
  • I’m doing this because I want to create the best and most comprehensive product possible. But because you’re an eager soul and buying a beta version (90% of the content is there and ready to consume though) the price will be heavily reduced.
  • You get to see the secret sauce. No one ever gets to see secret sauce. Blasphemy!
  • I want the product to represent skinny-fats as a whole. I’m far removed from the original skinny-fat days and it’d be nice to have perspective from those currently living them. We all share the same wounds. But mine are more like scars. I want the blood. The guts. The stuff that’s yet to dry. (This is also why an interview with Nate Miyaki — fellow skinny-fat sufferer turned nutrition dude — is included. [P.S. This interview is well worth the price of admission.])

So if you can excuse the dust and want some hands on attention, or you want to see the back end of product development, listen up. The fairest way to do this is through e-mail.

I’ll send an e-mail to everyone when it goes live. The first one’s to grab the deal before I cap enrollment are the lucky ones.

To get notified of when everything will go down, you have to sign-up for the exclusive e-mail list below. This is separate from my main newsletter!

This exclusive list will notify you of when you’re going to need to be at your computer to get a crack at being a charter member for the skinny-fat resource at a discounted price.

So if you’re one of those that’s been pestering me about this, I expect to see your name and e-mail soon.

See you then.

[ois skin="SFBETA"]

 

Some Results and Q&A About Combining The 40 Day Program and the PLP Program

In the previous article in this series, I explained how and why I combined The 40 Day Program with the PLP Program. Check it out here to get the full story: How and Why I Combined the 40 Day Program and the PLP Program.

At the end of the first article I dropped some crazy comments. Comments like:

Combining The 40 Day Program and the PLP Program…

  • Was the most important training experience of my life.
  • Had a crazy effect on me both mentally and physically.
  • Delivered surprising results.
  • Was the catalyst of conquering skinny-fat syndrome.
  • Was the equivalent of going Super Saiyan 4. (My armpit hair turned red. Just a little.)

And you’re probably wondering who what when were and why these things happened.

Stop wondering.

Just read.

The results of the 40 Day Program + PLP

Let’s get one thing straight: For the 60 days I combined these two programs, I didn’t care about progress. Ever. I had the most lackadaisical attitude of my training life.

I don’t think I looked in the mirror, “physique gawking,” more than twice. I never cared about how strong I was. Or how strong I was getting. Training was just “something” that happened every day. I was emotionless.

90% of the time I deadlifted 225 pounds. (Around 50-60% 1RM at the time.) I floor pressed a 75 pound dumbbell. I hip thrusted the same 225 pounds that was on the bar for deadlifts. I curled 95 pounds because it was easy to throw 25’s on each side.

My exertion rating for weight stuff, on a scale of 1-10, was about a 5. Didn’t care to strain more. Sometimes strained less.

But here’s what happened…

First, I stopped hurting. Gone were the minor aches and pains I had prior to starting.

1. My right shoulder was a wreck. I couldn’t overhead or bench press. (Why I opted for the unilateral dumbbell floor press.) But my shoulder slowly started feeling awesome. Day in and day out. It never failed. Overhead carries felt so damn good. Haven’t had any shoulder problems since. And I’ve been incline pressing and overhead pressing regularly. (In addition to playing softball and throwing regularly.) Not once did I do a fancy or frilly “prehab,” “rehab,” or any other “-hab” exercise.

2. Back then my chronic knee pain was creeping back too. My left leg (bad knee leg) was the only leg I could use when I was on crutches. It hated life. But two weeks into the program the pain subsided.

3. My body felt great. No pain. Anywhere. I felt like I could tackle the world.

Second, I started growing. Ironic considering I wasn’t training or eating for growth.

My arms started showing shape. Being skinny-fat, this was a bit weird. Arms were hard to come by. Yet they were the largest they’d ever been.

The shoulder growth was most surprising. They “anchored” my arm for the first time in my life.

My body just felt solid. Didn’t look in the mirror often, so it’s hard to comment on a per-body part basis. But I just seemed to “fill out.”

(Picture on right from time period of running both programs.)

Third, I noticed favorable changes in body composition.

Pants fit differently. Abs showed signs of life.

Fourth, I started to appreciate progressive overload. (Which, by the way, is different than strength.)

Throughout the 60 days I never added weight to the bar. But things churned because of the high frequency. Too often we associate progressive overload with weight on the bar. Bad mindset.

Here was my “overload” across the 60 days:

  • Pull-ups, squats, push-ups: 2370 reps
  • Deadlifts: 550 reps
  • Curls: 1100 reps
  • Hip Thrusts: 2200 reps
  • Dumbbell Presses: 550 reps
  • Waiter’s Walks: Who knows

I don’t care to calculate this against a traditional routine. But I know it’s “more.” Trust me. With numbers like that, it’s no wonder adaptation took place.

Fifth, my chin-up and pull-up ability skyrocketed.

Sixth, it reconceptualized my idea of stress and recovery.

I guess that’s normal any time you do 50+ chin ups for 20 consecutive days and feel great every step of the way.

Seventh, it made me focus on the bigger picture.

I made progress just by showing up. Showing up, not necessarily training with eye-popping intensity, became the priority. This has since stuck with me.

Eighth, it did some interesting things for my skinny-fatness. But I’ll save this for its own section. (After the Q&A.)

Common questions about doing both programs

Common question: So should I be bulking or cutting on this program?

Common answer: I have no idea.

In the Solutions for the Skinny-Fat Series, I mentioned capping training at four days per week to optimize carbohydrate cycling.

Training daily is a carbohydrate cycling hiccup. Can’t really happen unless you’re waiving intensity with carbohydrate intake.

This kind of program doesn’t really waive intensity.

I don’t think you should have a “bulk” or “cut” goal when meshing these programs.

The mesh isn’t ideal for maximizing muscle mass. It’s ideal for people that are tired of overthinking things. Tired of obsessing. Tired of details. People that need a mental and physical break.

Training daily might not seem like a “physical break,” but somehow it is. Just don’t be an idiot and max daily.

Common question: I’m a beginner. Can I do this program?

Common answer: No.

The 40 Day Program is for an intermediate lifter. I was deadlifting 225 pounds emotionlessly. This really isn’t that much weight. But it’s certainly above beginner range. You have to build a base of strength first.

Something like a 315 pound deadlift and 10 consecutive chin-ups is a good place to start.

Common question: Can I change exercises?

Common answer: Do whatever you want.

I violated The 40 Day Program structure because I needed to. Because it worked for my specific situation.

Do whatever you need or want to do. Just don’t go and substitute tricep kickbacks for deadlifts.

Common question: Am I going to get strong doing this?

Common answer: Die.

I’m going to be honest. I didn’t notice very much in the way of strength gains. But I don’t blame The 40 Day Program for this. I blame myself. Because I didn’t care. There were days I could have lifted more for my 2×5. But I didn’t. Just didn’t care to.

As I said: Don’t do this program if you have a specific, tangible goal. Do it out of apathy. Sounds nuts, but it’s just what I recommend.

And if you’re looking for strength gains, I think this program is more applicable to bring up a “similar but different” lift. For instance: If you’re a great bench presser, but haven’t inclined. You’d tackle the 40 Day Program with the incline press. Not sure tackling it with the bench press would yield huge benefits. Or I should say I don’t think it will deliver the same benefits. (Just my opinion though.)

Common question: How should I eat? Do I carb cycle with this?

Common answer: Dunno. And no.

80% of my diet was paleo. Eggs, meats, vegetables, fruits. The other 20% was whey protein and oats when I wanted to eat them. Was usually only once or twice per week.

Again…the apathy thing.

Common question: Will I lose muscle on this program?

Common answer: No. Unless you forego a movement responsible for your growth.

If you’re used to doing squats and you ditch squats, your legs will probably shrink a little. But I know of no one that trains consistently and loses their muscle. Nonsense if you ask me.

Common question: What lifts should I do on The 40 Day Program?

Common answer: Whatever you want.

Dan John gives you the guidelines. Just sack up and pick things you enjoy doing. Just don’t get all obsessive and pick twelve different pressing variations with the thought of  rotating them on a daily basis or something crazy.

Pick one press you love. Pick one posterior chain movement you love. Etc…

You do them often. Better enjoy whatever it is you pick.

Common question: How did you train that often? Didn’t you spontaneously combust!?

Common answer: If you’re asking this, you’re overthinking it.

Common question: How did you spend so much time training like this?

Common answer: Simple. It’s really not that much time.

PLP workouts took about ten minutes. The 40 Day Program workouts took about 30-45 minutes. That’s about an hour every day.

Common question: Do you have any thoughts on incorporating hill sprints into this?

Common answer: Absolutely!

I actually did hill sprints during this. Just do them once or twice per week. Treat them more as speed training sessions. Less as HIIT. Spend 20-30 minutes getting quality runs in.

Did you do any warm up sets for the deadlift before the 2×5?

Common answer: Yeah, usually some reps at 135.

Common question: Technical question, based on what you said: you did BW squats in the PLP instead of lunges?

Common answer: Good observation.

I actually intermixed them at my preference. If you have severe knee pain, go with body weight squats. Otherwise, lunge. Your legs will grow more. (More volume.)

Common question: Why are you answering questions like an asshole?

Common answer: Because they don’t matter.

For one time — just one time — stop over thinking things. I could lie about some magical things I did in combination with the program. Perhaps plug a certain diet or advertise a supplement – deceive you somehow.

I could say that “X” was the sole reason this “worked.” That “Y” might make it work better. And I’d probably make a lot of money from plugging some expensive things into those X’s and Y’s.

But I’m not here to do that. I’m never here to do that.

I’m here to tell you something. Something important. Something you don’t want to hear. Something that someone needs to tell you.

Combining The 40 Day Program and the PLP Program works because it teaches you the most important concept in fitness: just show up.

As my inbox floods with questions (this is fine, I like when people say hello), I can’t help but wonder how many people are going to “ask” themselves out of a training program like this.

“I’m sorry, I don’t know how to calculate my carbohydrates given the daily aspect of this program. Therefore, I can’t do it.”

“I”m sorry, I don’t know how much weight to lift. Therefore, I can’t do it.”

“I’m sorry, I can’t pick one press. Therefore, I can’t do it.”

“I’m sorry, I don’t have Master Roshi to coach me. Therefore, I can’t do it.”

To all of those people not willing to show up, I’m the one that’s sorry. Sorry for you.

There’s something about committing yourself to daily training that’s stimulating. But you have to be ready for it. You have to know your body “just a little bit.”

But you can’t focus on progress. You have to numb yourself. Otherwise you’ll overtrain.

You have to do one thing to make this program mesh “work.” That’s it.

Just one thing.

Show up.

Here’s some icing.

  • Don’t look in mirrors.
  • Don’t obsess about bulking.
  • Don’t think about cutting.
  • Keep your diet mostly paleo.
  • Add some tolerable starchy carbs a few times per week; on the days you feel drained.

But none of that matter unless you’re showing up day in, day out.

The skinny on what it did to my skinny-fatness

The program combination and daily stimulation does some wild things to your physiology. I consider the combination the catalyst that suppressed my skinny-fat shell.

But I’ll be back Wednesday with the full details of that, and details of how to become a charter member for my skinny-fat program. (Get the reduced price, free coaching, and all that fun stuff.)

In the meantime, send me any question you have about combining The 40 Day Program and the PLP program. Drop them below. I’ll give a serious (read: non-ass) answer and add them to this post.

 

 

Why and How I Combined The 40 Day Program and The PLP Program

And there sat the eleventh tip. The coup de gras of the first article I ever wrote for skinny-fat ectomorphs.

11. Every. Damn. Day

I’m going to end on a crapshoot. Some skinny fats are soft because they’re babied. From a biological standpoint, having muscle is an artifact of living a lifestyle that demands its creation. So it may be worthwhile to try training every day to provide a signal to the body that being a skinny fat just isn’t going to cut it.

Something tells me that running a combination of Waterbury’s PLP and Dan John’s 40 Day Program could do wonders for anyone.

Zoinks, Scoobs.

The questions poured in. Rightfully so too.

  • How do you carbohydrate cycle when you train daily?
  • Should I lift every day?
  • Should I do the 40 Day Program with more reps?
  • What kind of toilet paper do you use?
  • Should I train in extreme gravity like Goku did?

It’s finally time to answer all of the questions. This is a dive into how and why I combined the 40 Day Program with PLP, and what (I feel) it did for my skinny-fat genetics.

Why I chose the 40 Day Program

It was March 2011. I’d just gotten out of my cast. I walked with a severe limp.

The first month of recovery was all rehab (mainly balance stuff) and upper body training. But squats and deadlifts soon followed.

One day I squatted 315 pounds. Questioning my sanity immediately followed.

There I was. Two months removed from getting my cast off. Six months removed from breaking my foot in practically every place that it coulda’ broke. Yet I was teetering around with over three hundred pounds on my back.

It struck a chord within me.

I stopped caring. Squatting no longer mattered. What mattered was my health.

The deadlift seemed safer. I didn’t have to teeter out of a rack. I didn’t have to move under a load. I could just stand and lift.

But that still didn’t sit well in my stomach either.

I asked myself: “What would be best for my foot?”

My answer: Low load, high exposure.

Just so happens that the 40 Day Program is a low load, high exposure program that works just fine with the deadlift.

The choice was made: I’d train daily.

Why I chose PLP

Waterbury’s PLP article came out when I was a teacher. I read the article in between my classes. It intrigued me. But I still had my cast on at the time.

PLP popped back into my mind when I decided to train daily. It seemed reasonably do-able with The 40 Day Program. I was already gonna’ be training daily. And it would increase my muscle gaining potential. The 40 Day Program isn’t really a “mass” program.

Just so happens that the two programs blend perfectly.

  • PLP doesn’t stress the spine and gives volume that The 40 Day Program lacks.
  • The volume on PLP isn’t a concern because The 40 Day Program is low volume. The higher days of PLP (Doing 60+ chin-ups daily) would interfere with most other programs.
  • The 40 Day Program takes care of barbell lifts of interest. PLP takes care of body weight exercises of interest.
  • Both are perfect high frequency programs.

And the blend just “worked” for me. Neither program was “too heavy” or “too much” for my foot.

How I blended them together

The 40 Day Program is 40 days long. (Who saw that one coming?) PLP is 60 days long.

What gives? How did I make it work?

I tailed frequency a tad after the 40 days of the 40 Day Program. I only lifted five days per week on the 20 days after the 40 Day Program.

The 60 days of PLP stayed consistent.

What I ate and how I structured my day

I did this during the summer. I had no obligations—one of the best parts about being a teacher. So I could do whatever I wanted whenever I wanted.

Mornings started with a cup or two of coffee and writing. I was six months into intermittent fasting at this point.

At 11:30AM I did the PLP routine. Only took about ten minutes to finish. Even at day 60.

I ate after that. One pound of ground turkey. Some veggies. Piece of fruit.

Wrote some more for the ol’ blog you’re reading now and watched Curb Your Enthusiasm for a while. Did the 40 Day Program stuff at around 4:00PM.

Took about 45 – 60 minutes most days.

Second meal came after. Usually six eggs and more veggies. One or two days per week I’d throw some starchy carbs into this meal. Nothing to break down the house though.

Relaxed for a bit.

Around 8:00PM I had a bowl of cottage cheese (one cup or so) with psyllium husks and flax seeds. A man’s gotta’ poop with regularity. Right?

The specifics of each program

PLP training was upbeat. I rotated through exercises without much rest. But I never did more than twelve reps per set. I felt that more reps per set would be too stressful and eventually hinder the program. (Just my feelings.)

My 40 Day Program template:

  • Deadlifts 2×5
  • Unilateral Dumbbell Floor Presses 2×5
  • Hip Thrusts 2×20
  • Power Curls 2×10
  • Waiter’s Walks 2×20 yards

No. It wasn’t “exactly” what Dan John woulda’ ordered. But it was what I needed at the time. Hip thrusts gave extra lower body work without loading my foot.

I also ran hills once or twice per week. Nothing scientific. Ten-or-so reps of this steep fifty yard hill that was at my girlfriends apartment. As fast as possible to the top. Walk back down. Catch wind for a minute. Let the heart rate relax. Breath slowly and deeply. Then go again. It wasn’t meant to be HIIT.

I also played softball a few times every week. And I played ultimate frisbee on Saturdays when my foot held up.

The results of both programs

These sixty days could have been the most important sixty days of my training life. It taught me something that I can’t really explain in words.

The results were surprising.

Physically.

Mentally.

Everything.

I consider it the catalyst that took me to the “other side” of skinny-fat syndrome.

But I’ll save the results and good stuff for next blog post.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++

The skinny-fat product update

In other news…

I’ve been getting bombarded. Questions about my skinny-fat resource continue to pour in. Creating something that I’m proud of is a tough task. I want this thing to be great. I won’t settle for anything less.

I have seven documents right now. Two completed interviews. And I’m still working. It’s still being edited. Then it’ll be designed. And then I gotta’ do the juicy stuff to get it up for purchase.

But I have an idea! Ideas are good!

I’m throwing around the idea of a beta launch. The people that jump on the beta offer will help refine and create the end result.

There will be a heavy discount for the beta users. But there’s going to be a strong cap on the amount beta users allowed. I’m only one man and I can only sift through so much feedback. This feedback will come from a private support group that will have exclusive access to me and other beta users.

But I’ve said a bit too much.

More information next blog post.

See you there.

A Skinny-Fat Success Story

When people compliment Beast Mode Fitness Systems, it makes me happy. When people compliment Beast Mode Fitness Systems and  tell me how they’re putting the information here to good use, it makes me all warm and fuzzy inside.

A lot goes on behind the scenes here. When I’m not writing or answering e-mails, I’m helping the members of my coaching program.

Now, I’m not very overt with my coaching members. But I get quite a few requests to talk about that facet more—especially about skinny-fat success stories. And while I have clients that could vouch for my methods, especially on the skinny-fat side, I’m going to 1UP that by sharing a skinny-fat success story from a casual reader.

This person hasn’t paid me a cent. Yet he changed his life by soaking in the  stuff I put out on a regular basis—free of charge, mind you—and putting it to practice.

A few months ago, Johannes Dee contacted me and thanked me. I was so flattered and proud of his story, I asked him if I could feature it here. (Ok, Ok, it helped that he called me his idol.) Good news for you: He gladly agreed.

Enter: Johannes Dee

I used to be your classic skinny-fat ectomorph. My body composition was born from too many video games and too little physical activity—a lifestyle that also caused debilitating back pain for me as a teenager.

Despite the negatives of sitting in a computer chair, it beat the alternative: finishing last in every physical fitness test at school. Needless to say, my athleticism didn’t do me any favors in the “interested in team sports” department either.

I was called names. Teased. I wasn’t comfortable in my own skin. I didn’t enjoy the way I looked.

At the end of 2008, I started exercising regularly. Training was usually three days per week with an hour of aerobic work thrown in. This exercise alone (without dietary considerations) helped with both weight loss and my back pain.

It got better and better until 2009. Although things climbed—I was biking to work, I could finish the physical fitness tests I once failed—they also fell. When the winter came around, I was no longer biking to work. The weather eroded my motivation, and I stopped training.

I caught fire again in March 2010. I was lucky enough to come across a friend that taught me the meat and potato barbell exercises. But like most people, I fell into the trap of “bulking.” I got thicker, but my muscles didn’t exactly come along for the ride. I

Bulking didn’t go as planned.

In 2011, I came across Anthony’s article, “11 Training Tips For the Skinny-Fat Ectomorph,” and it revolutionized how I went about training and eating. I fully bought into what Anthony preached, which turned out being a great decision because it worked.

I started looking lean and athletic. My body felt better day by day and I lost 15kg in a relatively short time period. Every exercise I did improved. My pull-ups (that Anthony put such high praise on in Skinny-Fatness, Hardgainers, and High Frequency Training) went from 3-4 reps per set to 11 reps per set.

Here’s a quick glimpse of some of the things I did:

  • I started intermittent fasting.
  • I started counting calories a bit more dilligently.
  • I followed “complicated carb cycling” principles.
    • More carbs on training days
    • Less carbs on off days
  • I increased my protein intake as a whole.

(Anthony’s Note: See The Diet to End All Diets for help.)

All in all, that article, Anthony’s perspective, and Anthony’s website helped me create not only a better body, but also a better life. I look and feel better than I ever have before.

+++++

How’s that for some motivation? Got a success story of your own? Let me know about it below. Got any ways you’re using the information here? Do the same — drop it below.

And thanks for being here. I really appreciate it.

—–

photo credit: 1UP

Skinny-Fatness, Hardgainers, and High Frequency Training

You’ve surely heard the term “hardgainer” before.

Hardgainers have a difficult time gaining weight and making progress in the gym.

The prescription for their problem is almost always to train less frequently and to eat more food.

OK. I kinda get that. It kinda makes sense.

Kinda.

But the big question?

Are skinny-fat ectomorphs “hard gainers?”

IS SKINNY-FAT A HARDGAINING PROBLEM?

From the beginning of my days, I’ve been telling skinny-fat ectomorphs that they should probably do some isolation exercises and include some higher repetition work into their training program. (And by that I mean 8ish reps.) See my evidence: Solutions for the Skinny-Fat Ectomorph Part III.

My rationale for such is that skinny-fat ectomorphs are “hardgainers” of muscle. But they aren’t “hardgainers” of fat. 

The hardgainer prototype is a skinny guy that has trouble gaining weight. Period.

Hardgainers certainly exist. One of my readers flummoxed me when he asked if I had any suggestions for gaining weight. I told him to eat more (naturally), but he was already downing 7000 calories daily. Now that is a true hardgainer — someone that can’t gain anything, be it muscle or fat.

So skinny-fat guys and gals aren’t really hardgainers in that sense because they “gain” something rather easily. It just too bad that “something” happens to be fat. It’s not so much that the body can’t utilize and store extra calories (as a true hardgainer), it’s just that the body doesn’t store and utilize the extra calories in the name of muscle and looking “teh sexiness” naked.

This is a problem of partitioning, a concept that is touched on in Solutions for the Skinny-Fat Ectomorph Part IV. Needless to say, there’s a bunch of factors that effect partitioning, all of which are explained in the upcoming skinny-fat resource I’m busting my tail to finish.

In the mean time, I wanted to talk about a “hunch” I have. This isn’t something to be found in any research paper, so keep that in mind. It’s a meandering thought backed up by my personal experience. But it must just cure your skinny-fatness.

IS THERE A SECRET TO TRAINING?

The thing about skinny-fatness is that it never really goes away. Sure, I look a hell of a lot better than I used to. But the genetic factors that effect partitioning aren’t really malleable. “Fixing” it is done through training and diet. This means anytime your training or diet slips, the skinny-fat shell gets exposed. (Increased fat accumulation in the lower chest, love handles, etc…).

The generalized advice to fix partitioning is to get stronger and eat more wholesome foods. But think it goes much deeper than that (probably why the resource I’m creating is already over 100 pages), specifically with training.

Typically, skinny-fat peeps’ terrible genetics default their recovery capacity to, well, shady at best. This means they’re often handed the typical hardgainer recommendation of training more intensely with less frequency.

The first problem with this, as we now know, is that skinny-fat ectomorphs aren’t typical hardgainers. The second problem is that a generalization like this neglects the subtleties of stress and recovery.

SHOULD YOU TRAIN MORE FREQUENTLY?

I get a lot of question about my eleventh tip in the very first article I wrote on skinny-fatness.

11. Every. Damn. Day

I’m going to end on a crapshoot. Some skinny fats are soft because they’re babied. From a biological standpoint, having muscle is an artifact of living a lifestyle that demands its creation. So it may be worthwhile to try training every day to provide a signal to the body that being a skinny fat just isn’t going to cut it.

What? Is this blasphemy!? Train more ? How can that be? Isn’t recovery an issue? How can training more be better?

Calm down. Breathe in. Breathe out.

Patrick Henry once said, “Give me liberty or give me death.” For whatever reason, I like the tone of this quote and I usually translate it into an athletic fitness ultimatum that goes something like, ”Give me intensity or give me frequency.”

It’s gotta’ be one or the other. Can’t be both unless you’re a hand selected survivor of intense systems like the Soviet and Bulgarian athletes of the 70′s. In other words: can’t be both unless you’re an Olympic caliber athlete.

Out of fear of underrecovery, this usually means skinny-fat people are told to train less frequently. But to understand why this might be a mistake, you have to go back to the premise of stress and recovery. Although this was touched on in Solutions for the Skinny Fat-Ectomorph Part I, I expanded on this concept in the resource I’m working on to make it clearer as it’s the overriding tenant of training.

Basically, the body is nothing more than an adaptation from the signals it’s receives from the environment. Keep in mind you’re responsible for these “signals.” You choose what your body gets exposed to. Those 12 beers on Saturday? Yeah, your fault. (Forgiven if they were Guinness. Or Dragon’s Milk.)

I’ll repeat what I said before:

From a biological standpoint, having muscle is an artifact of living a lifestyle that demands its creation.

The more frequently you signal for the necessity of having muscle, being strong, and living lean, the better your chances are of  having muscle, being strong, and living lean. You just have to make sure you don’t exceed your capacity to recover from the signals. So more is better unless more means a failure to adapt.

Think of it like a suntan. The more time you’re in the sun, the more potential you have for tanning. You won’t necessarily burn (overtrain) from high frequency unless you combine it with high intensity. If you’re pale as sin, you have less leeway between the two (frequency and intensity).

Skinny-fats are the “pale” people of the training world, so teetering between the two has to be done diligently.

Now, let’s compare training philosophies.

  • More frequent training sends signals more frequently, albeit at a lesser intensity. (It has to be of a lesser intensity. Remember Patrick Henry?)
  • Low frequency training send signals less frequently, albeit it at a higher intensity.

But should people with pale skin crisp in the sun for three hours straight a few days per week? Or should they use shorter, more frequent, less intense exposures?

HIGH FREQUENCY SOUNDS GOOD, BUT…

High frequency sounds great, right? Skinny-fat ectomorphs, however, simply aren’t strong enough to warrant frequent training. PLP and The 40 Day Program are for people that are kind of already “strong enough.” Personally, I don’t think anyone should think about running The 40 Day Program until 60% of their 1RM for their big posterior chain movement (deadlift, for instance) is 225 lbs.

When you aren’t “strong enough,” the signal simply isn’t intense enough to produce a worthwhile adaptation. Going with the suntan analogy, strength is the sun’s brightness.

  • Being strong is like having a high and bright sun in the sky. Under these circumstances, shorter, smaller, and frequent exposures can work.
  • Being weak is like having a bunch of cloud coverage. Shorter, smaller, and frequent exposures are all for naught. In this case, a longer duration would work better.

Therefore, skinny-fat people need to gain a baseline level of strength. Using a high frequency program to gain that level usually doesn’t work because most high frequency programs aren’t systematic in their progression. They’re often used by advanced lifters because they know how to go by “feel.” Because of this, I don’t like high frequency barbell training for anyone that is better off served on a more deliberate beginner progression.

I guess it’s a good thing I advocate training methods that extend beyond the barbell.

BE SURE TO BANK ON BODY WEIGHT

I put a huge stock on bodyweight exercises. Huge. Back in February, when my little cousin started training under me, I told him he was going to hate to love chin-ups. (When he saw his arms growing, true love happened.) In a few months he went from doing three reps to eight reps per set, and he went from doing one tough-as-nails dip to ten dips per set. Progress was slow, but deliberate.

In my opinion, the chin-up is the master skinny-fat lift. You must get good at it. Must. Being good at chins represents all things anti-skinny-fat — precisely why we start out so bad at them.

Getting good at them means having a “decent” body composition and pretty good relative strength. The exercise itself sends all of the right signals. And remember: we want those signals sent as often as possible.

The chin-up, being a body weight exercise, is much easier to recover from than most barbell exercises. Since it’s the skinny-fat antitheses, it’s the prime candidate for high frequency training.

But, as usual, there’s a problem. Skinny-fat ectormophs can usually only pull off one or two chin-ups (if not zero). Remember the whole brightness spiel above? Yeah, this is a problem.

Jumping into a high frequency program — even though that’s the ultimate goal — at a sub-par strength level is suicide. Not only will your progression be derailed, but you will likely end up with elbow problems because the tissues simply aren’t yet adapted enough.

HERE’S THE PLAN OF ATTACK

While I can’t back this up with any study, I’m willing to bet a lot of my progress to this point has come from doing chin-ups at a terribly high frequency. I do them every day I train during my warm-up.

The warm up is the workout. I never touch a barbell before doing a basic dynamic warm up, thirty chins, push-ups, squats, and copious jumping jacks. Yes, even on lower body days.

- Beast Mode Training

Hell, I even do some on my off days. In my mind, they are that important for someone that’s skinny-fat, especially when done at a high frequency. You want those delicious signals being sent as often as possible. You want to them to demand the creation of muscle and the necessity of less excess body-fat. So here’s the plan:

1) Follow a program that yields slow and steady progress until you can do five or six chin-ups. This is not a high frequency program. (Yes, one will be included in the resource.)

2) You might as well throw push-ups into this mix too, so try to hit ten or twenty of those in one set. Honestly, dips would be a better choice as they are sister to chin-ups (with the entire body weight supported by the hands and all). But this could be a conflict of interest for a skinny-fat with a sub-par upper chest. For those kind of woes, check out The Best Damn Guide to Upper Chest Size and Strength.

Until you have the strength for the above two things, you simply don’t have the strength to warrant high frequency training. Diving into it will likely derail your progress, and zap your recovery for a more deliberate progression.

After you can bang out a few reps though, consider the following options:

1) Do a few “grooved” sets as a warm-up. As I mentioned, I always do at least ten chin-ups for a warm-up. Sometimes it’s twenty. Others, thirty. But never less than ten. No set is overly exhaustive either. You shouldn’t kill yourself. So if you can do five, do one or two sets of two. Pretty soon, those two reps are going to feel pretty easy. When that happens, go for three. You get the idea.

2) Try greasing the groove. Set up an Iron/Door Gym and simply do one or two repetitions every time you walk in and out of the room or something silly like that.

3) Do a high frequency program that actually gets you stronger. This is the preferred technique. There are many out there, like Pavel’s Fighter Pull-Up Routine for example.

All in all, just do something that equates to practice. For instance, after toying around on gymnastics rings, I found out just how bad my dipping strength was. So almost every day I’m just going in and doing something — not really to overly tax myself, but just enough to simply “get better” at them. That’s what this high frequency is about — getting better through frequent “practice.”

WHY HIGH FREQUENCY TRAINING WORKS FOR HARDGAINERS

There’s often talk about progressive overload being the most important aspect of training. Most of us equate progressive overload, however, with either more weight on the bar or with more reps.

But simply doing “more” also is progressive overload. Consider adding one “easy” set of three chin-ups to your warm-up that’s done four days per week. That’s an extra 12 chin-ups per week, 48 chin-ups per month, and 576 chin-ups per year.

Now, consider not doing that warm-up. That’s 0 reps.

576 reps.

0 reps.

That’s progressive overload too.

So why is this ideal for a hardgainer of muscle?

Because more frequent, less intense training is easier to recover from, which is ideal for the limited recovery capacity of a typical hardgainer. You’re also sending more signals more frequently to the body that demand the creation of muscle — you’re essentially beating the fatness out of the skinny-fat because it’s a constant hint for awesome relative strength.

Just know that there’s a fine line to be walked. Upping the frequency without proper care can lead to tendonitis and other nasty problems. As with the suntan, unguided exposure will probably leave you burned.

So save the barbell stuff for those strong enough to worry about it. Chances are, that’s not quite you yet. But once you hit the tipping point for some body weight exercises, consider a program that hinges progress on a high frequency. The results will surprise you.

+++++

Have any experience with high frequency training? I’d love to hear your thoughts below.

P.S. Anfernee Hardaway was my favorite basketball player growing up. I love that jersey. I’ve probably had it since I was ten.

 

 

Should You Bulk or Cut? (Skinny-Fat Must Read)

Does your current body composition dictate whether or not you should bulk or cut?

Should you let random people on the internet shape your personal appearance?

Is there some secret path that successful people scour in the cycle of gaining muscle and losing fat?

I’m not totally sure I understand why people ask whether they should cut or bulk, but what follows will lead to your answer. (And it just may surprise you.)

“Should I bulk or cut?”

Ever since seeing this question on many forums, I can’t help but wonder why the majority of people seek answers for their own physique in others. Everyone has their own favorite ice cream flavor. Your opinion on what a “decent” physique is unique to yourself. Asking someone else what you should look like is a little…strange.

Nevertheless, random rant aside, I think the question originated from the idea that, given a certain body fat percentage, you sit in a better spot to either gain muscle or lose fat. In other words, does body fat effect the ability to lose fat or gain muscle? In other words yet, can you build muscle as effectively if you’re fat as compared to if you’re skinny? 

Yes. And no.

  • If you’re overly fat, gauging muscle building progress is difficult. Muscle is harder to “detect” under fat, and it’s easy to get discouraged from an an apparent lack of results. (Whether or not change is happening is arbitrary, as it’s all about perception for most people.) The antithesis of this example is my little cousin. He’s a soccer player with a pretty low body fat. After two weeks we could tell that my program for him was working. There was nothing to stop the muscle from showing. Fat is like wrapping yourself in a blanket. The more blankets you have around yourself, the tougher it is to get an idea of what’s underneath.
  • If you’re overly fat, your hormones (insulin, estrogen, cortisol) are supposedly “out of whack” and less capable of building muscle. Yet there are many powerlifters that aren’t necessarily skinny that seem to do just fine in the muscular department, not to mention overeating in itself is also capable of building muscle in the absence of exercise in some populations.
  • If you’re incredibly lean, your hormones are supposedly “out of whack” too, although this only seems to be an issue in females with regards to pregnancy. Not so much with gaining muscle.
  • If you’re trying to stay incredibly lean, finding an ideal balance of “enough” calories to recover from training and build muscle while also staying lean is tricky. It’s easy to run in place — eat less than needed — and fail to make tangible progress in any one direction.

While the above points are the most scientifically relevant to the question at hand, they truly don’t matter under most circumstances. The hard science behind all of this can only take you so far. The true answer lies within both your psyche and your self-perception.

Why you should get lean

If there’s one thing people remember about what I’ve written, it’s my recommendation in 3 Reminders for the Skinny-Fat Ectomorph to get lean before trying to build muscle.

This recommendation has nothing to do with hormones, muscle building potential, or any of that fancy stuff.

It has everything to do with how you percieve yourself.

Skinny-fats, among many others, have a lot of emotional issues. I know because I lived the life. I was once told I had “girl boobs.” I wished, hoped, and dreamed I lived a different life.

These mental and emotional issues take credence over everything because until they’re sorted, you’ll never make headway in the right direction.

If you’re self conscious about your body fat, the last thing you want to do is add more body fat to your frame. It’s nonsensical, no matter how much “potential” you have to build muscle.

I can’t count how many e-mails I’ve gotten about this, and how many times it spirals people down bad paths. Here’s one from just the other day:

Well, I noticed an increase of belly fat, and not much increase of anything else in the mirror…so I went back to thinking…maybe I should get rid of all the fat first and then try to bulk, because if I continue things will get worse…you know this constant cycle.

It’s running in place. And this almost always happens.

But it’s a two way street for the following reason:

But again, I am still confused about should I cut to a low BF% first at all. I can see how that’s not going to be a pretty picture either.

I can only imagine what would happen if I did a more aggressive calorie reduction. I like the idea of getting rid of all the excess body fat first, but then I’m afraid I’ll look the skinniest I’ve ever been.

Tricky situation indeed.

The benefits of getting lean

The worst thing you can do is bounce back and forth between  between bulking and cutting, failing to make respectable strides in any one direction.

You decide to bulk, you get too fat, then you cut down back to your original level. You decide to cut, you get too lean, and then you eat your way back to your original level. Congratulations. You just entered the hall of failure.

Pick a direction, and stick with it. If you’re self-conscious about body fat, that direction should be to lean down. It goes back to one of those neglected principles earlier.

  • If you’re overly fat, gauging muscle building progress is difficult. Muscle is harder to “detect” under fat, and it’s easy to get discouraged from an an apparent lack of results. (Whether or not change is happening is arbitrary, as it’s all about perception for most people.) The antithesis of this example is my little cousin. He’s a soccer player with a pretty low body fat. After two weeks we could tell that my program for him was working. There was nothing to stop the muscle from showing. Fat is like wrapping yourself in a blanket. The more blankets you have around yourself, the tougher it is to get an idea of what’s underneath.

But there is more.

  • Getting lean is a lot easier than building muscle. You can get close to as lean as you want to be within one year if you’re at or under 20% body fat. You will probably not reach your ideal level of muscularity in one year though. So losing the body fat initially gets positive feelings rolling for the road ahead.
  • In light of the bullet above, if you bulk first, you’re going to end up cutting and rebulking. Few people are willing to stay outside of their comfortable body fat level year round. I don’t see the point in  the bulk-cut-bulk-cut-bulk ordeal when you can just start from a solid lean base and then slowly build muscle from there as written about Getting Lean and Staying Muscular. (The only downside to being lean is that initially increasing calories is met with trepidation for fear of re-gaining fat. This is a small hurdle to overcome though.)
  • If you bulk first, you have a longer cut ahead of you.
  • Being lean makes bulking progress easier to gauge.
  • Being lean is better for minimizing damage potentially done during a bulk. You can sense if you’re on the right or wrong path faster. Damage is easily reversible. If you overeat for a two weeks and notice yourself extended beyond the comforts of your body fat, it’s only going to take one or two weeks to return to baseline. This is the entire idea behind Nutrient Autoregulation: The Clean Bulk That Actually Works. (A book of mine to accompany a few resources I’m working on. Explained more in Getting Lean and Staying Muscular.)

Don’t make this mistake

I’m going to go ahead and assume that if you’re asking whether or not you should cut or bulk, you have both muscle that needs gained and fat that needs lost. (Why else would you ask the question?) Although this seems like a stupid thing to mention, I know people that have 10% body fat and wondering if they’re “too fat.” (OK, you got me. That was me at one point.)

Quick mention: in the name of body fat, and to give yourself a better picture of what body fat percentages truly look like, I highly suggest checking out Nerd Fitness’s Everything You Need to Know About Body Fat Percentage.

If you want muscle, you should probably gain muscle. If you want to be leaner, you should probably lose fat. But if you want to be muscular and lean, get lean first and chip away at the muscle building process. This means you can stay lean year round without turning into a lardcase. And by “lean,” I mean around 10-15% body fat.

From my experience, it’s unrealistic to maintain a lower body fat than 10% if you’re going to build muscle. You can maintain a lower body fat if you’re not trying to build muscle though.

A final must-read on getting lean

Getting lean doesn’t mean foregoing all training outside of “cardio.” Some traditional lower intensity aerobic work can be implemented into your training, but the most important facet of getting lean is increasing or maintaining strength via strength training. It’s often common to “save” strength training until a lean state is hit, but this is a mistake. (And a topic for another day.) So don’t forget to play around with the barbell on your quest down to a comfortable body fat. And If you enjoyed this post, be sure to check out my archive of skinny-fat resources.

Bulking disclaimer: I’m not a big fan of the traditional bulking and cutting designations, but I realize their use. In the sense of this article, I’m merely using them to mean either losing fat or gaining weight—be it during a low “clean” process or a hulk weight gain process.

+++++

Your turn: What do you think? Get lean first or bulk up first? What path did you follow?

 

3 Reminders for The Skinny-Fat Ectomorph

“So what do you think, Anthony? Does he take steroids?”

Questions like these, I’ve come to expect over the years. So I sipped my beer and peered into the crowd of people tailgating at the Pittsburgh Pirates game, trying to find the person of interest.

Looking at the mass of people drinking cheap lite beer and eating overly processed meats struck something within me. A concept I intuitively knew was brought to life: everyone is so damn different.

Some people looked like Snoop Dogg. Others, like Biggie Smalls. And then, of course, there were those that were some kind of LL Cool J jacked.

This made me think about skinny-fat ectomorphs, and how people tell me that the body-type doesn’t exist. And it’s true, to a point. Somatotypes were created for psychology. Not physiology.

But everyone reacts differently to food. To exercise. To life. The mechanisms as to why don’t really matter. So for those of you that balloon around the waist and lower chest and yet somehow sport tiny wrists and upper arms, this is for you. From one skinny-fat to another.

1. Create a solid base – get lean

Let’s talk about “bases.” Having a solid “base” to work from is an underrated commodity in the physique business, especially among those that don’t want to get overly fat in the muscle building process.

People are quick to recommend a full out “bulk” to those looking to gain muscle. This is what I like to call, the sculptor method — throw as much clay together as possible and carve away at the details.

But us skinny-fats have perceived ourselves as “fat” long enough. Prolonging this mental turmoil through “bulking” is a failure waiting to happen.

Instead, think “bases.” Building muscle is much easier when starting from a solid base—a physique that you’re comfortable with, allowing  nutrient autoregulation to be used more effectively.

The “lose fat, gain muscle” route is tempting to follow. While it can be done, the process is slow and inefficient when you’re at a higher body fat. Mentally, it’s more refreshing to make serious and tangible progress towards a goal. So for most everyone worried about body fat, it’s better to get lean and be done with it.

If you have skinny-fat baggage, you’re probably sick of excess body fat. So get rid of it. Now. And don’t let it come back to a discomforting level ever again.

Tariq Qureshi was kind enough to let me use him as an example, as his personal situation is perfect for this reminder. Below is a before and after photo of Tariq. 

Tariq’s story starts out similar to most other’s. He wanted to get bigger so he pounded down protein and carbs, thinking that fat would somehow into muscle. After realizing he was going down the wrong path, he spent the next few months leaning down.

During the process, he lost a lot of muscle. So he tried bulking again, but with only excess body fat to show for it. Eventually, he leaned down while questing for strength using intermittent fasting.

What I like about Tariq’s journey is that it’s an echo of mine. But looking back, we share similar feelings about our failures.

It has taken me much longer than some of the others to achieve a reasonable level of leanness, but I have learned a lot about my body during that time.

- Tariq

Tariq’s story is important because he created a wonderful “base” to work from. Sure, he lost some muscle getting to the “base.” But once there, slowly building up is much easier because a lean physique affords a lot of freedom.

Now, most skinny-fats cringe when I tell them to lean down and forget about muscle mass. Don’t get me wrong, do your best to retain muscle. But don’t obsess over it. Our genes aren’t prone to the whole idea of being “jacked and strong”  in a calorically deprived state.

But the short term loss is a long term gain. Reaching an ideal “base,” makes building easier. You can err on the side of “more calories” more frequently, which means better muscle building potential.

So take two, four, six, whatever, months and lock yourself in on fat loss. Lean down to a comfortable level. Get to that solid “base,” and then slowly build from there.

2. Cheat days usually mean game over

During the week, you kill it. You’re on your way to an awesome base physique.

And then comes the weekend.

You worked hard. You deserve a little freedom, don’t you? So you have a drink or two. Maybe some french fries…and ice cream. Hot wings. Cake, too. And some of that sweet tea you were practically addicted to. And before you know it, you’ve gone “overboard.”

While cheat meals can be a powerful rejuvenation tool, most people that implement them on a weekly basis don’t fare too well unless a calorie counteracting strategy is used. (Like in John Romaniello’s Fat Loss Forever, or something.)

I know, I know. Tim Ferriss said cheat meals were OK. And I’ve not only written about, but also employed cheat meals more than most people.

But at the beginning of your journey, you need structure. You need to learn discipline. So while I talk about sipping beer and indulging here and there, know that there was a stretch where I didn’t look at any sweets or “junk” food. Cheating is better suited for those already lean enough and disciplined enough to handle the effects.

Although I’m growing away from the concept of “cheating” (a decision made for many reasons that will be written about in the future), I still technically “cheat” every week. The foodie inside of me wins most times, especially because I enjoy food challenges. (There’s a three pound hamburger challenge that I’ve been eying up, for instance.)

But there’s a difference between a minor indulgence and gorging yourself into oblivion (which I used to do regularly). Overall, I think the concept of “cheating” is murky water that carries a lot of psychological baggage.

After a year of feasting, fasting, and everything in between, I’m of the opinion that most people aren’t prepared for “cheating,” as it’s difficult to manage and tends to cause frequent setbacks and mental lapses. So when you’re trying to lean down, don’t think about cheating. (Unless you’re prepared to fast or use a calorie counteracting strategy, as referenced above.) Once you reach a comfortable body fat, however, feel free to experiment. But tread lightly. And don’t say I didn’t warn you.

3. Do isolation exercises, but don’t go overboard

An old mentor of mine, Adam Wehmann (some may know him as Chicanerous) subconsciously taught me about the concept of “important work.” Important work was the stuff you would do if you were strapped for time. In other words: you have thirty minutes to train, which lifts are you going to do? Of course, this always corresponded to the big compound lifts: squats, deadlifts, presses, and pulls.

Now, I’m known for telling skinny-fats to train their arms. And they should. Anyone that wants big arms and doesn’t directly train them showcases flawed logic.

But training your arms doesn’t mean devoting one hour to curls, or having an “arm” day. To clarify, I simply mean picking one or two direct arm exercises and spending ten or so minutes getting some work in after the “important” work for the day is done.

As for what arm exercises are best, I’m a fan of simplicity. The standing barbell curl is an underrated exercise. It raises the heart rate more than any seated exercise, bench press included. It also hits the upper back and “core” pretty well. It’s gotten some negative press for not being very anatomically friendly. But if they don’t bother you, you’re better off having included them in your program

++++++

What do you think about starting from a solid “base?” About not cheating? And about including isolation work?

I’d love to hear your opinion, especially if you feel you are a skinny-fat sufferer. Leave your comments below, and I’ll be sure to reply.

The X Physique Part I – What It Is, Why You Want It, And What You Should Know About It

Don’t kid yourself.

It’s not about absolute muscle mass.

It never has been.

Yet you train like it is.

Pick your physique: Steve Reeves, or Ronnie Coleman?

Of course, I know the answer.

That’s because it’s about proportional muscle mass.

It’s about the X Physique.

WHY THE X PHYSIQUE IS APPEALING

Growing up skinny-fat, I had narrow shoulders, small wrists, and a wide waist. While I always wanted big muscles, they were the means to the end, more so than the end itself. What I really wanted was proportion – wide shoulders, a narrow waist, and powerful legs. Together, these form something known as the X Physique.

For a long time—and for whatever reason—I associated this X Physique with athleticism and virility. I’m no oracle, but I was onto something.

Fear Primes May not Affect Women’s Implicit and Explicit Mate Preferences

  • Women value physical characteristics in men such as height, muscularity, and broad shoulders (Buss, 1994; Barber, 1995; Franzoi & Herzog 1987)…

Foundation of Human Culture - Human Morphological Variation

  • Narrow hips are another advantage in fast running….

Human Evolution and Ultrarunning

  • According to that hypothesis [D. M. Bramble and D. E. Lieberman, "Endurance running and the evolution of Homo." Nature, vol. 432, pp. 345-352, 18 Nov. 2004], such well-known human traits as lack of body hair, high perspiration rate, upright stature, high arches, broad shoulders, and large gluteus maximus were selected through evolution to make it easier for us to run long distances.

The Science of Sex Appeal: An Evolutionary Perspective

  • …Using facial photos of male college students that were cropped at the neck, those with faces that women rated as attractive had more pronounced wedge shaped torsos (broad shoulders and narrow hips), a masculine feature many women prefer. In addition, these same males had stronger grip strength scores (see also Fink, Neave, & Seydel, 2007; Sell et al., 2009), and more sex partners…
  • Proportions alone are associated with physical attractiveness. In the crudest sense, the more you appear like a certain sex, the more attractive you will be be. We don’t like ambiguity. [My conclusion: Since the X Physique is so culturally recognized in males, it's what's deemed as attractive from first glance. Same can be said for females and the hour glass shape.] We look for immediate cues to tell us whether or not someone can be mated with.

YOU NEED TO EMBRACE SOME VANITY

Is it cultural? Is it evolutionary? Physiological?

Really, who cares?

Part of building a body that matters is being proud of what you look like

The seed is implanted. And as long as it’s there, we have to address it. So embrace your vanity. When I was in 9th grade and a classmate told me I had “boobs,” I sure didn’t care about culture.

Of course, it’s not good to base the entirety of your existence on your physical-self. But let’s face it: feeling good about your appearance trickles to every aspect of your life.

How you perceive yourself is the most important step in any physical transformation – and why I started the Skinny-Fat Ectomorph series with a post on mentality.

Bottom line: If you have any semblance of aesthetic regard, and you don’t address it, you will fail. If you have no hook with how you look, don’t worry about it. But if one slice of your brain wants bigger arms, and you ignore it, you’re cooked.

YOU’RE SCREWED, SORT OF…

Shoulder and hip width are genetically determined, and you can’t adjust skeletal structure. So if you’re born with narrow shoulders relative to your waist (like me), you have a lot of work ahead of you to make yourself into an X.

Instead of hating your parents and cursing to the clouds, focus your energy on building muscles in the right places to give yourself a better shot at the X Physique.

It sounds easy, but I kind of already know your problem.

You’re focusing on the wrong places.

The term “broad shoulders” is a bit misleading. If you’re throwing all of your focus to the front deltoids, you’re wasting your time.

THE NEED TO KNOW 1: TRAIN LIKE A BODYBUILDER

Everyone wants programs. But programs pale compared to principles. You won’t often find me writing programs for free on this website. I’m much more concerned about you developing the right philosophy – a mindset that sticks with you for life.

The following will be hard to swallow. But stop thinking about maximal strength. Just stop.

The goal here isn’t to break powerlifting world records. The goal is physique. That’s all.

YOU NEED TO TRAIN LIKE A BODYBUILDER, NOT A POWERLIFTER

I’m not talking about doing machine work or a host of isolation exercises, either.

When it comes to lifting weights, the goal is to continually overload the muscles. The easiest and most trackable way to do this is by slapping more plates on the bar. The problem with this philosophy is that the muscles become secondary to the weight.

But the muscles are what actually lift the weights. 

This is different than most athletic performance methods. Plyometrics and the likes are more suited to train the nervous system and the entire musculoskeletal complex. So muscular control isn’t as concerning.

But when dealing with “carving” a physique, Arnold said it best: ”The weights are just a means to an end; how well you contract the muscles is what training is all about.”

This shift away from muscular control — in my opinion — is at fault for a lot of barbell related injuries. You should be lifting weights — unless you’re doing a complex or overspeed movement — with your mind in your muscles.

Control the weight, mentally and physically, through-out the entire range of motion. Make the muscles work in every phase. Think about them squeezing and lengthening.

And before I get the hatred, I’m not downing the importance of strength. Dan John hits it when he said: “You need to do two things to get stronger: add weight and do more reps. The answer has never been: lift light weights for high reps, or lift heavy weights for few reps. The answer remains: Lift heavy weights for high reps.”

But my addition to this is: heavy weight, high reps, with the mind in control of the muscles at work. (And by high reps, I’m talking about 5-10, which is “high” compared to the “few” reps referenced by Dan.)

The goal is to “sculpt.” Remember, it’s about proportional muscle, so what muscles get stressed the most in movement is important. And you can control this with the mind-muscle connection.

THE NEED TO KNOW 2: IT’S LESS ABOUT PRESSING

Broad shoulders are a hallmark of the X Physique. But it’s not about pressing, really. Pressing is secondary. Maybe even tertiary. So if you’re benching to grow the upper body for the X Physique, you’re missing out.

It starts with the back. Hands down. Most famous poses for showing off the X Physique don’t even involve the shoulders.

More specifically, it starts the the lats. The lats are the number one muscle to give someone a wider look. Some people even call lats “wings.” And I’m all about wings and taking flight (metaphorically) here at Life As Sport. Hell, even birds expand their wings to intimidate others. Big lats are a big mental boost.

THE NEED TO KNOW 3: BIG ARMS HELP

After building wings, building big arms helps create an a wider look. Yes, I said it. Big arms. But this only applies is you have the right back development.

Big arms without the wide lats means you just look like another goon. But taking one look at Don Howorth will help you understand what I mean.

THE NEED TO KNOW 4: PRESSING POSITION MATTERS

Of all body parts, the chest is the most finicky. And despite what I said earlier, pressing is still important. It’s just not the end all.

One thing to note about the X Physique and pressing is that puffy chests usually lose. Arnold had a great physique, but he rarely gets put in the same category as others for having the X Physique.

In this regard, the chest and pressing exercises chosen are important  and should tailor to your body type. Blindly flat benching because powerlifters do won’t get you very far in the aesthetic column.

THE NEED TO KNOW 5: IT’S NOT ABOUT SIZE FOR THE SAKE OF SIZE

Although I touched on this earlier, if you’re in the running for an X Physique, it’s less about gaining a set amount of weight. Being 200 pounds reveals little about how that muscle is packed on your frame. It might be more beneficial to be 190 with the muscle in the right places.

It’s important you pick exercises and divide your time among what will propel you towards your goal. In other words, everything you do should have a specific goal or meaning attached to it. Don’t do anything for the sake of doing it. Make sure its specific rationale fits in with your entire rationale.

In most cases, a good physique is an illusion between muscle groups built in the right proportion when compared to one another. Anyone with an X Physique will immediately be perceived as more muscular, even if they are smaller or lighter.

This is the beauty of proportion, and is something that has been lost over time.

Again, not to dog basic barbell training — it is certainly is important — but the idea of not tailoring your program to your psychological wants (getting an X Physique, for instance) has cursed the population of people that pick up weights. The vast majority lift to look better — even if they lie and use the “it’s all about strength” excuse.

For someone that never wants to compete in powerlifting, there’s no reason why they can’t forego flat benching for incline benching, if that’s something that will work better for them. It’s not like swapping out benching for bosu ball one arm semi sumi functional presses. It’s one basic barbell lift for another. And I’m all about basic barbell lifts. Just the ones that are best suited for each goal. Consider it basic barbell training with a twist.

MOVING ON FROM HERE

Take the above advice and use it to adjust your program or fix your mindset as needed. I’ve been saying it for a while: if you want big arms, curl. Sure, do your chins and rows. But curl too. Make sure your program address your psychological desires, first and foremost. And then ask yourself if you have a specific type of physique that you’re reaching for, and if you’re actually doing anything to reach it.

Future articles in this series will give more specific advice on how to build an X Physique through exercise selection and whatnot. I don’t want to give you too much at once, of course.

But let me ask: What do you think of “sculpting” a physique? And what do you think of training for looks? Is it short-sighted? What’s the difference between lifting weights in front of a crowd and posing in front of a crowd? Should it be all about performance?

Drop your comments below. And most importantly, send this article to a friend if you think they’re lost or caught up in a philosophy that isn’t best for their long term progress.

 

Solutions for the Skinny Fat Ectomorph Part IV – Nutrition, Intermittent Fasting, Carb Cycling, and Hormones

For a long time, people ate six meals per day and the enjoyed every second of doing so. Lunking around Tupperware containers was a badge of honor, symbolizing a dedication to health. Then came intermittent fasting. Tupperware?Obsessive eating habits? So not cool.

When I first got into the game I devoutly counted every calorie I ate. It’s an obsessive lifestyle that I don’t wish upon anyone. But the past is important. The only reason I am nutritionally sound now is because I slaved over every calorie years ago. And overall, I think everyone that is locked in on their body composition has, at some point, gone through the same obsessive-calorie-counting-food-weighing phase.

So instead of blabbling that I don’t count calories or weigh food, the truth is that I used to, and it contributed to who I am. I know eggs have 70 – 90 kcalories and 1/4 cup of oatmeal is 150 kcalories. And if you’re ignorant of these nuances, maybe you need more obsession. It’s the four stages of learning, and you can’t jump from conscious incompetence to unconscious competence.

No, because after years of doing it slavishly and trying all sorts of eating styles, I’ve got a really, really good idea of how my body reacts to foods.  I’m really tuned into what’s going on so I don’t need to do that anymore.  But I couldn’t have gotten this way without keeping records and doing the experiments.

-          Jon Call (Jujimufu) in response to weighing food

The clean bulk

A few years ago, the consensus was that the clean bulk—gaining muscle without fat—was impossible. But since, the consensus changed. An idea still proliferates, however, that pancakes, maple syrup, and total disregard for body composition are keys to solid mass gain. But muscle creation isn’t expedited by an over ingestion of nutrients. If eating 3000 kcalories builds muscle, 6000 kcalories isn’t going to build twice as much muscle.

There’s an old adage about muscle growth being akin to laying bricks. Assuming a fixed number of workers, more bricks yield more building to a point. Once the workers have enough bricks to keep busy all day, sending more won’t lead to more output. So if we can only build ten pounds of muscle per year (plus or minus five to ten pounds for beginning and advanced trainees), trying to jam all ten pounds into a three month “bulk” window is silly. Even worse, fat cells (usually created during a “bulk”) are permanent. They shrink, but never really “dissolve.”

One reason for the popularity of the clean bulk comes from Martin Berkhan of Leangains.com, who regularly posts client updates showcasing the ability to get big and strong without getting fat and ugly. Martin is a pioneer of intermittent fasting, which refutes the superiority of a higher meal frequency. As I mentioned in Solutions for the Skinny Fat Ectomorph Part II, I’ve settled into intermittent fasting and carb cycling (a bastardization of Leangains) and it’s the basis of the strategy explained below, even though I’ve seen gains with both frequent and infrequent feedings.

Personally, I think most fitness professionals cling to the intermittent fasting boat out of necessity. Planning and pre-cooking six meals every day, seven days of the week becomes mentally taxing. The encouraging aspect of intermittent fasting and carbohydrate cycling, however, is that it better manipulates hormones. Hormones control both building muscle and losing fat. The specifics are complex, but the premise is simple: build muscle when you’re best suited for muscle growth and combat fat accumulation with you’re not suited for muscle growth.

The ins and outs

Partitioning describes how well the body handles excess calories. The guys mentioned in Solutions for the Skinny Fat Ectomorph Part I are good partitioners. Good partitioners have a hard time gaining fat, and gaining muscle is all about sacking up and eating.

For a skinny fat ectomorph, sacking up and eating leads to sacking up around the waist. We are on the low end of the partitioning totem pole for two reasons. First, genetics and hormones. Second, we have a judgmental eye when it comes to self body composition evaluation. We obsess over the slightest subjective imperfections, as mentioned in Part I. This can negatively affect hormone levels. How well partitioning goes depends — in general — on how hormones are working.

Carbohydrate cycling manipulates insulin — a storage hormone usually released in response to eating carbohydrates. A generalization is that when insulin levels are high, the body is prone to “build” and “store” things. So when insulin spikes, fat intake should be low to avoid its storage.

Again, that’s a generalization. Carbohydrate cycling can get complex, turning people away from its use. But by sticking to a few basic rules, it’s not complicating. The jist is this: more carbs, less fats, and enough protein on training days; less carbs, more fats, and more protein on rest days. And to get a little more specific:

Training Days

  • High protein intake
  • Mid-High carbohydrate intake
  • Trace fat intake
  • At least one gram of protein per pound of body weight
  • Leaner cuts of meat
  • Carbohydrate intake around one to three grams per pound of body weight

Off Days

  • High(er) protein intake
  • Mid-High fat intake
  • Trace carbohydrate intake
  • Carbohydrate intake comes from cruciferous vegetables
  • Fattier cuts of meat allowed
  • One to 1.5 grams of protein per pound of body weight
  • Less than 100 grams of carbohydrates

For the specifics, and how to structure the intermittent fasting philosophy around your training schedule and daily life, check out the Leangains Guide. There’s no need to plagiarise Martin’s fantastic body of work. Below, however, is my personal adaptation and overall structure on how I use intermittent fasting.

Wave your way to gains

Building muscle is a long term process. You don’t suddenly add one pound of muscle to your frame after eating turkey legs, corralling wenches, and downing some mead. It’s not an “either-or” process. You’re not “either” building muscle “or” losing fat.

The goal of bulking is to linearly gain weight and then linearly lose the fat that accompanied the journey. The rationale is that during the “bulking” period you’re optimizing the ability to gain muscle. And truly, you are. You’re in a caloric surplus and you’re telling the body it will be fed plentifully. But the body isn’t a linear creature.

When gaining muscle while minimizing fat, there are no straight lines or steep climbs. Instead, there are small waves that gradually increase in gradient over time. So every day is an experiment. Every day can vary. Everyday you can signal your body to do different things. You can bulk one day and cut the next. It works like this: If you wake up feeling super lean and ripped, eat more. If you wake up feeling puffy for a few consecutive days, eat less. Daily caloric intake depends on how you feel. Consider this nutrient autoregulation.

A generally accepted caloric increase for building muscle is 500 kcalories above maintenance. Now, “maintenance” level will vary as not one equation can predict everyone’s metabolic rate. But a gross formula is multiplying your body weight by anything from thirteen to sixteen. Here’s an example:

Body Weight = 200 pounds, 90.7 kilos

x 13

Maintenance Intake =  2600 kcalories

Note: I’m guessing this equation assumes a relatively lean body fat. When comparing two people of the same weight, the person with more muscle and less fat will have a higher metabolic need. This little nugget is precisely why relying on calculators is difficult and why I prefer coming to a “maintenance” level by eating a set amount of food for a week or two and seeing how the body reacts. I’d set a baseline with thirteen first and move up from there.

Instead of sticking the maintenance level day in and day out, the idea is to fluctuate the intake depending on both training status and subjective feel. Think of it as daily, yet controlled, mini bulking and cutting cycles.

If you’re already at a comfortable body fat level…

  • Eat an extra 500 kcalories on your training days. If, after one week, you are still lean and mean, slowly add more kcalories on your training days.
  • Keep your rest day calorie level constant. But if you ever feel puffier over a four or five day span, keep your training day calories to 500 above maintenance (at most), and drop your rest day intake to 500 kcalories below maintenance.
  • If this doesn’t get you leaner in a few days, drop your training day calories to maintenance and keep the 500 deficit on rest days. But always try lowering the rest day 500 kcalories before lowering training day kcalories.
  • Training frequency can vary, but have no more than three to four “heavy” sessions for high carbohydrate feedings. In general, you want to save these for the lifts and body parts that are lagging to ensure they will be fed accordingly. So if you want bigger shoulders, follow an intensive pressing session with a high carbohydrate day.
  • Just because you train doesn’t mean you need to carb you face off. Just understand the training days that occur outside of the three or four high carbohydrate days will be best suited for strength development, not size.

 If you’re leaning out…

  • Keep the 500 kcalorie deficit on rest days.
  • Stay at maintenance on training days.
  • If you’re struggling to lose one pound per week, then — and only then — drop your training day calories down 500. Never further.
  • Keep two to three heavy training sessions per week and use these days as your high carbohydrate days. (Similar to the strategy mentioned above.)

The more precise version of the above advice…

  • Body weight x 13-16 = maintenance.
  • On training days, intake maintenance x 1.1 or 1.2.
  • Rest days, if feeling puffy, go for maintenance x 0.8 or 0.9.

A note on food types:

There are a lot of philosophies that dismisses gluten, dairy, and other foods. These kind of debates are outside of the scope of this article. My advice: experiment. Some people feel awesome after eliminating gluten. Some notice no difference. I’m a fan of the old school bodybuilding staples. Meats. Fish. Eggs. Vegetables. Fruits. Potatoes. Oats. Rice. Beans. Nuts. Dairy (if tolerable).

Carbohydrates peri-workout

The age of superultratectonicperi-workout nutrition is over. You don’t need to gorge on liquid sugar pre-workout to refuel your glycogen (it’s filled long before the immediate pre-workout hours). Likewise, you don’t need a Super Mass Gainer Pro Z X Grade post-workout shake.

Following Leangains, I’m a fan of working out in a fasted state after the ingestion of BCAAs. (Although for a few months now I haven’t used them and I’ve yet to notice much.) Post workout, no shakes are required. Just a wholesome carbohydrate dense meal. Precision Nutrition, another damn good nutrition resource, also recommends secluding most carbs to the post-workout window (especially when trying to lose fat).

 Hormones and fasting

Warning: If you don’t have a solid grasp on the above nutritional concepts, below will only confuse you. But discussing this is in the best interest of everyone reading, and I feel it will be popping up in the future. Just another issue to think and tinker with. For the most part, however, the following section is broscience. Proceed with caution.

Fasting can boost growth hormone and may do the same with testosterone. When both of these hormones are churning, lipolysis (breakdown of fat) is primarily rocking to fuel the body. The moment insulin surges, however, both testosterone and growth hormone levels fall. Theoretically, ingesting a monsoon of carbohydrates post-workout kills the workout enduced surge of growth hormone and testosterone . So there’s compelling evidence for saving the carbohydrates until hours after the workout. After all, feasting later in the day may be better for fat loss. And about the immediate post-workout refuel — there might not be a need. Have you ever noticed that, after a workout — for the most part – you’re not overly hungry?

The problem with making this an absolute is that there are many factors to consider. By carbohydrate cycling and fasting, you’re already benefiting from elevated growth hormone and testosterone levels through out the day. And because you’re limiting carbohydrate intake on rest days, your body might better utilize post-workout carbohydrates.

So if you don’t carb cycle or fast, avoiding carbohydrates in an eight hour window (-+ 4 hours before and after workout) may be your only shot to bask in elevated growth hormone and testosterone levels. In this case, a good post-workout meal would be eggs and meats with trace carbohydrates from vegetables or something similar.

Odds and ends

There are a lot of nutrition programs and protocols out there. Truthfully, most of them probably work to certain degrees. For the skinny fat ectomorph looking to lose weight with no regard for retaining muscle mass, detailed nutrition isn’t necessary. It’s more about reducing overall caloric intake and jacking physical activity through the roof. Understand, however, that this method tends to take  muscle mass with it (as it does for most people without the use of steroids). But if that’s the goal, that’s the goal. Skinny fat ectomorphs don’t have good muscle retention genes when nutrient deprived. It’s a tradeoff you have to be willing to take.

The better way to go about both losing fat and gaining muscle is the long term training approach mixed with mini periods of bulking and cutting – otherwise known as nutrient autoregulation – by fluctuating hormones through dietary manipulation that concide with your training days.

I need your help

Skinny fat brethren, I need your help. This article is all over the place. I know there are loose ends that remain loose. But after working on this article for over twelve hours, I simply don’t have “it” in me anymore. Whether it be in the comments, Facebook, Twitter, or whatever else, I need your feedback. Tell me what I’m missing and what needs more detail.

To give you an idea of what’s to come, specific topics like GOMAD and other popular principles are in the wing. If you have any others, request them. Also, I plan on writing a post about my specific nutritional strategy (eating only twice per day) and a “storytellers” version of the information above (I’m going to tell a story of a guy or gal using these principles so you can see what a typical day would look like). Lastly, I’m thinking of giving away one or two free coaching spots for my readers. So show your face and give me some feedback. I’d appreciate it.